Message from @Kazimir Malevich
Discord ID: 551902549003862018
I was referring to @allhailthebowl
Someone who believes the modern mantra
If you let me finish my argument
I'm actually arguing that nature is correct
that is why we find things like homosexuality disgusting
Morality is an idea that exists in the minds of humans, which exist as a consequence of human biology
because it is dysgenic
and not sustainable for the tribe
And it is an adaptation for human survival
No. A modernist is someone who believes nothing can be accepted without hard scientific or mathematical proof. Let me grab the official definition. It's essentially the oposite of post modernism which is total crap.
I am not a subjectivist if that is what your were getting at @💀Fury 6💀 . But obviously all abstractions are subjective
I am not a modernist then
@RealBullWhip TL;DR
genes are very accurate in diagnosing what is eugenic and what is dysgenic
for nature what is good is eugenic
Nah, that's not the definition of modernism
what is bad is dysgenic
that is the only thing that exists in reality
Modernism differs depending on the area of study you are talking about.
I think all concepts should be consistent with science. If science disproves your argument, you need a new one
except science today is a joke
that rejects basic evolutionary biology
breeds of dog can differ in intelligence but human tribes cannot
they're just as much ideologues as other groups
Science is only as good as the scientist. Science â„¢ is a joke yes
empiricists do this as well
they try to abstract things so far
that you have millions or infinite factors
such as with intelligence
they include infinite factors and say "see you can't prove racial intelligence difference!"
If we go with what fury is talking about. Then this kind of modernism is defined by the belief that we can understand the world through pure rationality. That we can work from the purely material to the modern construction of society
well yes when you include infinite elements in a set I cannot define all the elements let alone show a relation with another set
You are just mistaking dogma for science
btw discrete maths should be the basic maths taught in schools
Science is just making provable theories
and testing them
but that's just a tangent
No that IS science
yes
predictive validity is science boiled down to its most basic part