morality does not exist

morality is arbitrarily defined by what you feel

there is no real basis to it

Oh boy. You guys take a hard modernist perspective to everything huh?

the only morality we have as humans really is in-group, out-group, dysgenic, eugenic

which is based entirely on what your genes force you to feel

you are just an expression of your genome in different contexts

It's actually opposed to modernist belief. Your liberal "rights and "freedoms" are by definition modernist

bad things in morality are defined via your genome saying it's probably bad

good things in morality are defined via your genome saying it's probably good

You do understand what a modernist is right?

I'm saying that all morality stems from your genes telling you what to feel

I did not say this is bad or good

so don't put words in my mouth

Modernist or perhaps postmodern

I was referring to @allhailthebowl

Someone who believes the modern mantra

If you let me finish my argument

I'm actually arguing that nature is correct

that is why we find things like homosexuality disgusting

Morality is an idea that exists in the minds of humans, which exist as a consequence of human biology

because it is dysgenic

and not sustainable for the tribe

And it is an adaptation for human survival

No. A modernist is someone who believes nothing can be accepted without hard scientific or mathematical proof. Let me grab the official definition. It's essentially the oposite of post modernism which is total crap.

I am not a subjectivist if that is what your were getting at @💀Fury 6💀 . But obviously all abstractions are subjective

I am not a modernist then

@RealBullWhip TL;DR

genes are very accurate in diagnosing what is eugenic and what is dysgenic

for nature what is good is eugenic

Nah, that's not the definition of modernism

what is bad is dysgenic

that is the only thing that exists in reality

Modernism differs depending on the area of study you are talking about.

I think all concepts should be consistent with science. If science disproves your argument, you need a new one

Using it as a generality is not effective.

except science today is a joke

that rejects basic evolutionary biology

breeds of dog can differ in intelligence but human tribes cannot

they're just as much ideologues as other groups

Science is only as good as the scientist. Science ™ is a joke yes