agriculture is dysgenic

I don't even say this as a larper

in the buddhist sense maybe

rule of law doesn't exist

rule of law is only enforced via a monopoly on violence in a geographical area

and you can arbitrarily change it

if you lose to someone else it also changes

much like the social contract it doesn't exist

freedoms ensured by the state are not freedoms at all but temporary privileges

There are certain freedoms we just expected in certain cultures

that generally weren't taken

like english common law

until it was

depends if you wanna go thick libertarianism or thin libertarianism definition of freedom or death cult buddhism freedom

thick libertarianism = healthcare is required to be an individual with agency

thin libertarianism = nothing can be given but also don't take anything away if it doesn't violate NAP

buddhist death cult freedom = life is materialistic in of itself

thus freedom is materialistic

Obviously the buddhist slave morality is shit

@snakeeater stop doing thick libertarianism

it's retarded

it just ends with socialism

>everyone needs a gun provided by the state to defend themselves

yes

on a biological level

you will endure what you must

there is no freedom except what is purchased

purchased in the sense that you have a monopoly on force

Seeing as how the state will never give up power

the natural state of post-agricultural life is statism

as a result of the centralization of force

freedom is privileges purchased by a monopoly on violence

yes

abstract in the sense it doesn't exist

it's just an idea

it has no bearing upon life beyond that people believe in it

he's right you know

just like crimes are arbitrarily defined

there is no crime against humanity

rape was a normal occurrence for millions of years

in every biological organism

sure you could get reprecussions

but in of itself it wasn't a crime

society is not a construct though

tribalism is engrained in your DNA

if we consider tribalism a form of society no it's a biological strategy that certainly exists in many species

agriculture exists

morality does not exist

morality is arbitrarily defined by what you feel

there is no real basis to it

the only morality we have as humans really is in-group, out-group, dysgenic, eugenic

which is based entirely on what your genes force you to feel

you are just an expression of your genome in different contexts

bad things in morality are defined via your genome saying it's probably bad

good things in morality are defined via your genome saying it's probably good

I'm saying that all morality stems from your genes telling you what to feel

I did not say this is bad or good

so don't put words in my mouth

If you let me finish my argument

I'm actually arguing that nature is correct

that is why we find things like homosexuality disgusting

because it is dysgenic

and not sustainable for the tribe

genes are very accurate in diagnosing what is eugenic and what is dysgenic

for nature what is good is eugenic

what is bad is dysgenic

that is the only thing that exists in reality

except science today is a joke

that rejects basic evolutionary biology

breeds of dog can differ in intelligence but human tribes cannot

they're just as much ideologues as other groups

empiricists do this as well

they try to abstract things so far

that you have millions or infinite factors

such as with intelligence

they include infinite factors and say "see you can't prove racial intelligence difference!"

well yes when you include infinite elements in a set I cannot define all the elements let alone show a relation with another set

btw discrete maths should be the basic maths taught in schools

but that's just a tangent

yes

I'm saying that modern scientists will force you to prove a relation between a set with infinite elements and another set

which is impossible

even if I show you a relation between race and IQ

and then control for income

and then control for schooling

there's always "racism lowered their IQ dude"

"brutalism bro"

it will never end you see

that's why you can't talk to these people

no no

they're saying this because they think they can be fixed

no one will argue with you when you say blacks today are way dumber than whites

at least not honestly

they'll say that it's a temporary state as a result of context

and there is literally no way to disprove it

because context is infinitely complex

they'll add new variables repeatedly even if you start breaking down their argument

which is why a lot of modern science is a joke

there's too many confounding variables in half this shit