Message from @El Comte
Discord ID: 649055536721035301
i would rather believe the actual science
which does not support evolution
Lol
So wrong
lol
so wrong
good argument
we need a new discussion topic here
lol
Your own sources contradict your statements @Puppet Master
you do not know how to read the source then
Yes I do it says it there itself
I've already repeated it two times
it says it may be, could be, thought of, no where does it say this is evidence or proof
Viable ancestor. Meaning we can assume that it is our ancestor as there's enough for it
@Puppet Master I sent the link which talked about it a bit. Your own source speaks in detail about the remarkable anatomical similarities.
We're talking about history and paleontology and paleo archeology. There's never a 100% regarding that
Theory doesn't mean not proven. In science you have theories which are heavily backed up with fact but are still "theories". In addition, Charles Darwin was in no way a materialist liberal.
We'll never know the full truth
anatomical, they are going on skull shape, like i said
Your entire argument is based off of pedantism @Puppet Master
Not just skull shape
Finger layouts, leg bones
All sorts of stuff
I read for like a minute and saw that, haven't even read the whole thing yet
The Britannica one
to view the universe in purely materialistic ways like atoms and nothing else is ignorant. dark matter is a mystery and there is much we do not know
Jesus is "thought" to have died in 33AD and have been exceuted by Romans on the urgings of the Pharisees. Is this untrue because I said thought of?
Have you even read your own source dude it says way more than just muh skull shape
yes the bones and all i know
no dna evidence or anything
I don't view the world materialistically. I've seen shit which has proven there's more to life than that. But on the otherhand I also trust the evidence and reasoning behind evolution.
The skulls alone show a direct development from ape to humans
you guys keep thinking it is evolution vs creationism i keep telling you there are more options
1. Well maybe the bones are enough
2. We share an extreme genetic similarity with Chimps and yet you ignore thsi
They may not 100% those exact hominids are our direct ancestors but it shows the evolutionary path of hominids
I haven't even mentioned creationism @Puppet Master
why bring up jesus?