Theory doesn't mean not proven. In science you have theories which are heavily backed up with fact but are still "theories". In addition, Charles Darwin was in no way a materialist liberal.

We'll never know the full truth

This mindset of evolution wrong cause religion is just as stupid as religion wrong cause evolution

anatomical, they are going on skull shape, like i said

Your entire argument is based off of pedantism @Puppet Master

Not just skull shape

Finger layouts, leg bones

All sorts of stuff

I read for like a minute and saw that, haven't even read the whole thing yet

The Britannica one

to view the universe in purely materialistic ways like atoms and nothing else is ignorant. dark matter is a mystery and there is much we do not know

Jesus is "thought" to have died in 33AD and have been exceuted by Romans on the urgings of the Pharisees. Is this untrue because I said thought of?

Have you even read your own source dude it says way more than just muh skull shape

yes the bones and all i know

no dna evidence or anything

I don't view the world materialistically. I've seen shit which has proven there's more to life than that. But on the otherhand I also trust the evidence and reasoning behind evolution.

The skulls alone show a direct development from ape to humans

you guys keep thinking it is evolution vs creationism i keep telling you there are more options

1. Well maybe the bones are enough
2. We share an extreme genetic similarity with Chimps and yet you ignore thsi

They may not 100% those exact hominids are our direct ancestors but it shows the evolutionary path of hominids

I haven't even mentioned creationism @Puppet Master

why bring up jesus?

Bones are a great indicator of how different species are related both extinct and present

It was an analogy and one I thought you'd connect with

Well what is this supposed Alternative

you could argue to unrelated species evolved to look similar due to similar enviromental changes. similarity does not autimatically mean relation.

Doesn't genetic similarity mean relation?

And that's been proven between man and ape

that is more complicated because the genetic code to create a thumb would be the same for us as it would be for an alien from another planet since it is a specific code that will allow for the creation of a thumb in the first blace. like if i want a dog to grow a thumb i would have to remove that thumb gene from one animal and insert it into the dog.

so an alien from a different planet that is humanoid could possibly have similar genes

That's complete nonsense we don't even know how alien life would be if it even passed singular cellular or even developed like we did

I mean if we can reasonably say cats and tigers are related I don't see it as unreasonable to say the same between man and ape.

it is not unreasonable. evolution is perfectly reasonable, just not proven.

It is my God

We may not be able to prove 100% that australopithicus is our direct ancestor but evolution has been proven to be true

That is undeniable

i deny it

😁

Figured as you've already shown to be somewhat of an creationist

Our ancestors supposedly living with dinosaurs