Message from @El Comte
Discord ID: 649054263774806026
just post it
SCOURCE plz
MOST LIKELY not definitively proven
I sent a link which talks a bit about it. Think for a second: why would it be believed if there wasn't any evidence?
I'll find more evidence if you insist
people believe a lot of things
Sure, but well educated scientists?
more? how about any?
Definitely proven is basically non-existent in science. It's always about what's most likely the case and the most likely scenario. It's all hypothesis and theory. That's how the method works
there is electric universe theory, there is string theory, scientists disagree on many things
Theories are just that: theories
They are not proven
So they cannot be taken as facts
Like your own Smithsonian source says viable ancestor for the genus homo
Or should not be
I don't know if any evidence exists that we will all be satisfied with, since none of us have any expertise in this area
scientific method. you do have to prove and others test and peer review. you perform experiments and so on
I would rather believe a theologian on the history of the Earth than a modern day materialist liberal scientist
i would rather believe the actual science
which does not support evolution
So wrong
lol
so wrong
good argument
we need a new discussion topic here
lol
Your own sources contradict your statements @Puppet Master
you do not know how to read the source then
Yes I do it says it there itself
I've already repeated it two times
it says it may be, could be, thought of, no where does it say this is evidence or proof
Viable ancestor. Meaning we can assume that it is our ancestor as there's enough for it
@Puppet Master I sent the link which talked about it a bit. Your own source speaks in detail about the remarkable anatomical similarities.
We're talking about history and paleontology and paleo archeology. There's never a 100% regarding that
Theory doesn't mean not proven. In science you have theories which are heavily backed up with fact but are still "theories". In addition, Charles Darwin was in no way a materialist liberal.
We'll never know the full truth
This mindset of evolution wrong cause religion is just as stupid as religion wrong cause evolution
anatomical, they are going on skull shape, like i said
Your entire argument is based off of pedantism @Puppet Master