Message from @El Comte
Discord ID: 649054593002504192
Theories are just that: theories
They are not proven
So they cannot be taken as facts
Like your own Smithsonian source says viable ancestor for the genus homo
Or should not be
I don't know if any evidence exists that we will all be satisfied with, since none of us have any expertise in this area
scientific method. you do have to prove and others test and peer review. you perform experiments and so on
I would rather believe a theologian on the history of the Earth than a modern day materialist liberal scientist
i would rather believe the actual science
which does not support evolution
Lol
So wrong
lol
so wrong
good argument
we need a new discussion topic here
lol
Your own sources contradict your statements @Puppet Master
you do not know how to read the source then
Yes I do it says it there itself
it says it may be, could be, thought of, no where does it say this is evidence or proof
Viable ancestor. Meaning we can assume that it is our ancestor as there's enough for it
@Puppet Master I sent the link which talked about it a bit. Your own source speaks in detail about the remarkable anatomical similarities.
We're talking about history and paleontology and paleo archeology. There's never a 100% regarding that
Theory doesn't mean not proven. In science you have theories which are heavily backed up with fact but are still "theories". In addition, Charles Darwin was in no way a materialist liberal.
We'll never know the full truth
This mindset of evolution wrong cause religion is just as stupid as religion wrong cause evolution
anatomical, they are going on skull shape, like i said
Your entire argument is based off of pedantism @Puppet Master
Not just skull shape
Finger layouts, leg bones
All sorts of stuff
I read for like a minute and saw that, haven't even read the whole thing yet
The Britannica one
to view the universe in purely materialistic ways like atoms and nothing else is ignorant. dark matter is a mystery and there is much we do not know
Jesus is "thought" to have died in 33AD and have been exceuted by Romans on the urgings of the Pharisees. Is this untrue because I said thought of?
Have you even read your own source dude it says way more than just muh skull shape
yes the bones and all i know