Message from @El Comte
Discord ID: 649053890528018433
you said evidence
That I sent
you said WE KNOW
where is the evidence? a hunch is not evidence
Viable ancestor of the genus homo. Basically the scientists agree he's mostly our ancestor or similar to them
fucking idiot
It isn't a hunch.
seriously you can not back up your argument so you resort to "moron" "idiot"
then PROVE IT
Mr. Eternal AngloToday at 8:00 PM
I.e. there is evidence
To support that conclusion
WHERE?
Your own source says that it is most likely
just post it
SCOURCE plz
MOST LIKELY not definitively proven
I sent a link which talks a bit about it. Think for a second: why would it be believed if there wasn't any evidence?
I'll find more evidence if you insist
people believe a lot of things
Sure, but well educated scientists?
more? how about any?
Definitely proven is basically non-existent in science. It's always about what's most likely the case and the most likely scenario. It's all hypothesis and theory. That's how the method works
there is electric universe theory, there is string theory, scientists disagree on many things
Theories are just that: theories
They are not proven
So they cannot be taken as facts
Like your own Smithsonian source says viable ancestor for the genus homo
Or should not be
I don't know if any evidence exists that we will all be satisfied with, since none of us have any expertise in this area
scientific method. you do have to prove and others test and peer review. you perform experiments and so on
I would rather believe a theologian on the history of the Earth than a modern day materialist liberal scientist
i would rather believe the actual science
which does not support evolution
Lol
So wrong
lol
so wrong
good argument
we need a new discussion topic here
lol
Your own sources contradict your statements @Puppet Master
you do not know how to read the source then