Message from @IliasSpook
Discord ID: 642729498097352705
Also now that I think about it I've never even seen a white/black relationship in my life ever
Only fools think it is okay to race mix.
It is possible
Sounds very reasonable tbh
I have seen white black relationships, but I have noticed that in those instances, the black doesn't have all that much education so they probably don't understand how they're betraying their group.
What about the white?
I've seen far too many race mixing relationships over here
Always a white girl with a black dude
Bruh
I thought the Deep South was more based
Honor killing when?
It largely depends
On where you are
the libtard regions of south carolina are awful
Is it just trashy whites with blacks?
Yea
Wiggers
I hate movies so much
Thru should be executed anyway tbh @IliasSpook
So subversive
You ever notice how in every movie featuring a mental institution none of the patients are actual crazy people?
🤔
They always either "misunderstood" or the meds are making them crazy
This one chick who kept saying she didn't find "muh white bois" attractive?
To the fuckin gallows
Definitely
Idk if this is true but I have heard that apparently one time when someone accused William Luther Pierce of being "racist" he half-jokingly replied "I'm not racist, only whites will hang on the day of the rope".
Pretty funny either way
Not really. Look at one flew over a cuckoo's nest; a good portion of the main cast are sane, but the majority are ill. The sick just don't get as much screen time due to how the audience can't relate as much. @Lucien
Also, every story needs conflict and a slow recovery isn't as engaging as some one wrongly locked up.
Also because most major directors aren't competent enough to portray mental illness
in a meaningful way
@HadrianEtAntinous @The State hungary doesnt have bullshit leftist courses btw, foreigners who know how to speak english though get attend the uni FOR FREE
Thats why Debreczin has above average arabs, asians and blacks, even US mutts.
@yThos Well I think you just accidentally answered why there's such a race mixing problem. As we highlighted with post colonial theory and black nationalism among other things derided, a lot it isn't bullshit; a huge portion of leftist stuff is genuinely good political philosophy needed for a complete understanding of the social sciences. There's a reason we, as fascists, object to being called mere rightwingers, for we also take a lot from the left. The left isn't entirely bullshit; it can often be based, just as much as the right.
In fact, maybe even more so.
Tbh I don't get the objection to being called "right-wing". Yes, fascism does not seek to be "far-right" for the sake of being "far-right", but our values such as order, tradition, and the like are rightist as opposed to the leftist values of progressivism and egalitarianism.
@The State Progressivism is stupid, but on egalitarianism, don't straw man the left; Karl Marx himself wrote extensively on why equality is too vague a goal and often counterproductive and bad to pursue, even at times considering himself anti-egalitarian. Just look at the socialist maxim; different people have different needs and different people have different abilities.
They reject hierarchy as something inherently evil, thus they are egalitarian.
Not to mention the nature of the progressivism within leftism essentially makes the left partake in a "perpetual revolution" against even their own status quo. So long as you use "leftist" language, and don't return to whatever might be perceived as "tradition", you are good. For example, there are recorded private letters between Marx and Engels where they mocked homosexual behavior, and even more radical on that question have been a few communist thinkers. For example, I do not remember the guy's name, but there was one communist in the 20s who wrote something like "if we exterminate homosexuals, fascism will cease to exist", and others have proclaimed homosexuality to be "bourgeois decadence". However, such reasoning would not work among modern communists, who now see opposition to homosexuality as "reactionary" and "bigoted". I would not be surprised if in a decade or two, the left will adopt even more radical and strange ideas and would likely condemn certain things they condemn today as "reactionary" or "bigoted" given the perpetually revolutionary nature of their ideology. However, given that nature, whatever they turn against next will not be something leftists have fought for specifically, or something perceived of as inherently leftist, such as "anti-racism" or whatever.
I know that I was kind of rambling, but do you see what I mean? @HadrianEtAntinous