Message from @kristall.night
Discord ID: 335065142767255552
@Gavius Corvus @Pharaoh Bearclaw III - FL Net neutrality is the kikes making the Goy pick which way they are going to kike them. It's that simple
"Get the AltRight package, with your edgy favorites like RebelMedia and Gateway Pundit!"
Essentially yes
@Tyrone right now I can access daily stormer website just as easily as I can access CNN. In what way would allowing Comcast to restrict my access to that, or make me pay more for it, be better?
If I make a website called "allniggersmusthang.com" Comcast currently has to allow anyone who uses their service to access my website, no questions asked. How does giving them the right to not do so help us?
Bingo
"You can't blame us Goy, your leaders you elected chose this for you!"
Net neutrality is imperative for these circles
Just watched that "Goodnight alt right" song lmao
BRING
IT
PUSSIES.
How is there not a noose emoji?!?!
Or a Long Knife Emoji?
<:bowlcut:330193760644497409>
the only emoji that matters
The bowlcut of St. Dylann Roof
@BryceB-ND NAZI PUNKS FUCK OFFFFFFF
That's not what net neutrality is, I think. Afaik it's more along the lines of websites and services being able to pay ISPs to allow more bandwidth for their sites / ISPs being allowed to charge some websites and services more if they exceed a certain bandwidth
I could see that happening as well
It's not about blocking specific sites, but rather giving more resources to some. Net neutrality bill prevents ISPs from being able to do this
IE ISPs want to charge services like Netflix more and/or services like Netflix want to be able to pay a premium for higher bandwidth and net neutrality would prevent that
The reverse would also hold true though. Imagine daily stormer with massively throttled bandwidth, and having to pay ISPs to give readers more than 90s dialup speeds on the site.
Exactly. That is the type of thing people AGAINST net neutrality are worried about
Oops
Reverse that
People supporting* net neutrality
Axing net neutrality right now would be akin to repealing the first amendment tomorrow because the kikes benefit from free speech. Maybe so, but it's in our interests to have it right now.
It's in our interest that ISPs not be allowed to pick and choose which sites to dedicate more resources to
The internet is the wild fucking west and I aim to keep it that way
Yep. Even if we need the government to force ISPs to keep it that way haha
The problem arises that Net neutrality AND the ICANN handover occurred at the same time. That combined is how they are really going to kike Daily Stormer, TRS, etc.
They are likely to start making sites pay to keep their domain registration and the UN or some other extra national body will selectively impose Hate Speech terms.
Well that's a whole other issue
Inter-related.
Watch this hand silly Goy, and notice not the other preparing to slit your throat.
Both hands are holding knives. One hand is immediately a threat, and something that can be stopped.
While the other is still killing you.
So we just lay down and die?
If they're going to use ICANN to take down our sites, it doesn't really matter if ISPs can throttle traffic or not.
I don't think they can use ICANN to take down any of our sites, tbh.