Message from @Tyrone
Discord ID: 335068639889981440
<:bowlcut:330193760644497409>
the only emoji that matters
The bowlcut of St. Dylann Roof
@BryceB-ND NAZI PUNKS FUCK OFFFFFFF
That's not what net neutrality is, I think. Afaik it's more along the lines of websites and services being able to pay ISPs to allow more bandwidth for their sites / ISPs being allowed to charge some websites and services more if they exceed a certain bandwidth
I could see that happening as well
It's not about blocking specific sites, but rather giving more resources to some. Net neutrality bill prevents ISPs from being able to do this
IE ISPs want to charge services like Netflix more and/or services like Netflix want to be able to pay a premium for higher bandwidth and net neutrality would prevent that
The reverse would also hold true though. Imagine daily stormer with massively throttled bandwidth, and having to pay ISPs to give readers more than 90s dialup speeds on the site.
Exactly. That is the type of thing people AGAINST net neutrality are worried about
Oops
Reverse that
People supporting* net neutrality
Axing net neutrality right now would be akin to repealing the first amendment tomorrow because the kikes benefit from free speech. Maybe so, but it's in our interests to have it right now.
It's in our interest that ISPs not be allowed to pick and choose which sites to dedicate more resources to
The internet is the wild fucking west and I aim to keep it that way
Yep. Even if we need the government to force ISPs to keep it that way haha
The problem arises that Net neutrality AND the ICANN handover occurred at the same time. That combined is how they are really going to kike Daily Stormer, TRS, etc.
They are likely to start making sites pay to keep their domain registration and the UN or some other extra national body will selectively impose Hate Speech terms.
Well that's a whole other issue
Watch this hand silly Goy, and notice not the other preparing to slit your throat.
Both hands are holding knives. One hand is immediately a threat, and something that can be stopped.
While the other is still killing you.
So we just lay down and die?
If they're going to use ICANN to take down our sites, it doesn't really matter if ISPs can throttle traffic or not.
I don't think they can use ICANN to take down any of our sites, tbh.
Yeah highly doubtful
Realistically if they tried it the UN would piss and moan but nothing would happen because the UN generally can't or won't do dick
Just watch.
I'll believe it when I see it
International (((Normative))) hate speech rules are going to start being a common topic
@Tyrone I'm just trying to understand your reasoning here. Suppose you're correct. What course of action are you suggesting?
Or are you just saying we're fucked it's over go home?
I'm not saying there's a solution outside getting enough normies to start screaming about internet free speech like they do about "muh Guns!!!""
they already do they call 'em libertarians
libertarians love their net neutrality because muh free market
This is why as much as OUR goals need to be pushed via a post-political model we have to surreptitiously invade Republican, conservative, and libertarians circles.
Libertarians have been invaded by establishment leftist
They have no real power and think they are cool rebels
The boomers we all hate are our best bet on this one