Message from @canip
Discord ID: 635197963727011859
More powers so that China can be combatted
Yes, that's what I want
Lmao
The nationalization of all Chinese assets in Europe <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
Good we got here from that, now we know that the reason you have your idelogy is because you want the power
Good job youll never get it
Yes, of course it wants power <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
What a stupid statement to make
the countries can nationalize it themselves without the union
And when China strikes back against those countries? @canip
Economically?
Thats where we differ I guess
I think of more people than my self
strikes back in what way?
Just let the Chinese Invest in Europe, There is no need for any nationalisation, Just ensure there is enough protectionism that they can't take over
we have military pacts
Damned if we don't act, damned if we do
One by China, one by liberals
"We must follow liberalism, even if it means our destruction!"
sure, makes sense
I mean this is all assuming the most successful system just stops to an old system that has been defeated before
china can't destroy our way of life if we do it first <:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
and that china can just keep spending....
and that so many more things keep happening
But yes also
*WE HAVE TO STOP CHINA ASSIMALTING US BY DOING IT FOR THEM BUT WITH A DIFFERENT NAME!*
You think the tactics of China have been tried before?
🤔
By whom?
Not the Germans (2nd Reich)
Not the Nazis
Not the USSR
What tactics do you speak of, foreign investment?
Using liberal systems and policies against us..
Like in Australia.
That's the issue youre not seeing. You are saying "Well we can't stop china investing in us with this part of the system, so lets enslave the population to the state"
It's conspiracy theorist levels of jumping to conclusions
Like the countless bribes. The owning 1 / 3 of all Australian water companies, the massive land ownership. The influence they have in the Australian government and legislation
Where have I said I wanted to "enslave" the population?