So therefore

Extreme ideas, since they tend to throw out this approach wholesale

That's why they're so dangerous

Gay marriage is now legal and abortion up to 24 week decriminalised in Northern Ireland

thats good news

Up until 60% into pregnancy, yeah great news

But why not 70% or 80%

I say lets make it 110%, or better yet 150%

Scratch this, make it 5000%

If a parent wants to abort their smartass pre-teen, should be perfectly alright

Since morals should be decided individually anyway, it doesn't really matter what other people think, only the mother should have a say in that

thats ok, as long as the father has a choice in paying for it

Yo I really hate tim pool I think 🤔

I Watched his sam seder debate and he came off real childish

He's young

He has a right to be dumb on some things

night mofos, hope no one burgles you or tries to abort your missus

I'm watching the Tim vs Seder clip, can someone explain to me what the selfown is?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Rdj0ngdMwY

Why does that guy look like a Jew?

@ETBrooD dude literally anyone who watches or is a fan of Sam Seder are fucking retarded

Sam Seder is fucking retarded

Tim *almost redpilled* pool

Yeah I watched it, and all I can think of is that:

Basically there is a underlying logic, re watch the video from the point of view that trump is currently putting people in concentration camps right now as we talk @ETBrooD

The best I can explain it is Tim starts out by saying there is rules against concentration camps, people won’t vote for it, but then say “but people voted for trump”

The only way that makes since is if you believe trump is putting people in concentration camps

So basically you have to put yourself in a shit lib mindset

But maybe Tim agreed that trump was doing that earlier in the debate but clearly didn’t believe it deep down if he fucked up like that

But I didn’t watch that debate, I could care less

I watched the full interview, Tim never said trump built/putting people in concentration camp. This clip is classic example of 'taking things out of the context'.

That or this is a classic example of the left projecting their thoughts and beliefs into the conversation when it never happened

https://www.reddit.com/r/Unexpected/comments/dl800s/cleaning_up_the_streets_of_london/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

https://interactive.news.sky.com/2017/brexit-countdown/

@Python I've rewatched the clip multiple times now, and I'm still confused after your explanation lol
Premise: "I'm not having to kill anybody"
Tim's rebuttal:
1) If you vote for *someone* who's going to build a concentration camp, then you are [having to kill people]
2) The concentration camp only gets built if enough people like you believe they should support *this person* [inaudible, 'in fear'?]
[Response to that: it gets built regardless]
3) Not true, we have rules for that
[then they have a short exchange about why so many people surprisingly voted for Trump, disgruntled voters, spiteful Bernie voters. 'They can't take our vote for granted'; and 'Do you think that lesson was learned ?' (that people's vote shouldn't be taken for granted) Tim: 'no way!']
4) But they voted for *Trump*

OHHHH I GET IT

They think concentration camp = death camp

<:npc:502497359419408384>

Oh but

Tim didn't dispute that part

His response was that conc camps only get built if blabla, not that they're not the same as death camps

So Tim is guilty of poor argumentation