Message from @Dubdogelmo

Discord ID: 636252922879016962


2019-10-22 17:17:39 UTC  

The point is that the refuelling is controllable and outside of the operations area.

2019-10-22 17:18:12 UTC  

Labour could, possibly if Corbyn decides to follow his pledge to support a GE once the extension has been agreed

2019-10-22 17:18:19 UTC  

non-nuclear, chances are you're gonna have to stop to refuel mid operations

2019-10-22 17:18:26 UTC  

Diesel carriers also piss off enviromentalists so that is a plus

2019-10-22 17:18:34 UTC  

I don't think the Lib Dems or Greens will

2019-10-22 17:18:41 UTC  

You don't have to stop, the operation can continue while refuling occurs @leavethisbotnet

2019-10-22 17:18:45 UTC  

As it did in the Falklands conflict

2019-10-22 17:18:46 UTC  

Actually the Lib Dems could

2019-10-22 17:18:49 UTC  

nuclear refueling is strategic concern, whereas oil refuelling is tactical and operational concern

2019-10-22 17:18:57 UTC  

They stand to gain quite a lot of seats in a GE

2019-10-22 17:19:31 UTC  

US with its industrial capacity can deal with the strategic concern easier than UK

2019-10-22 17:19:42 UTC  

The refueling and supply process can occur at any time and does not significantly hinder the operations of the task force

2019-10-22 17:19:47 UTC  

The reason that US has exclusively nuclear is they have to think of a way to spend the ridiculous budget the military gets

2019-10-22 17:19:48 UTC  

True, since they have 11 carriers <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-10-22 17:19:53 UTC  

But, most countries aren't America

2019-10-22 17:20:22 UTC  

Of course, it's a balancing act. For UK, non nuclear was the right choice.

2019-10-22 17:20:36 UTC  

I think the F-35B was as well

2019-10-22 17:20:47 UTC  

@Hopix There's running speculation that they deliberately changed the font to Comic Sans for hate Tweets

2019-10-22 17:21:00 UTC  

Rather than putting in a catapult and buying C's

2019-10-22 17:21:36 UTC  

F-35 is one giant mistake altogether.

2019-10-22 17:21:57 UTC  

I think the MOW is sensible to constrain their ambitions for now

2019-10-22 17:21:57 UTC  

Well, it's better than the harriers we were operating

2019-10-22 17:22:08 UTC  

And it's the best on the market that meets our requirements

2019-10-22 17:22:34 UTC  

Though, I'd love to see a UK designed aircraft to go on them

2019-10-22 17:22:41 UTC  

More military funding 😍

2019-10-22 17:23:01 UTC  

Once Brexit's restored us to our Imperial glory we can start spending big on the military

2019-10-22 17:23:14 UTC  

Not like UK had the money, time and spare diplomatic credit to ditch US with their failed lockheeb abomination and develop their own though...

2019-10-22 17:23:22 UTC  

Well, that's gonna require some annexations of former dominions

2019-10-22 17:23:24 UTC  

and some republics

2019-10-22 17:23:33 UTC  

That's the plan

2019-10-22 17:23:49 UTC  

War Plan Red has noted how extremely dependent the UK is on areas beyond the home islands

2019-10-22 17:23:59 UTC  

Reassert the queen's claims to the duchies of Aquitane and Normandy

2019-10-22 17:24:10 UTC  

Before a study conducted during WWII, UK war planning evidently called for capitulation in the event that the home islands were blockaded

2019-10-22 17:24:11 UTC  

Well, the hope was economies of scale would lower the cost of the aircraft @leavethisbotnet

2019-10-22 17:24:15 UTC  

Which to an extent is happening

2019-10-22 17:24:28 UTC  

When you look at origional unit costs compared to today

2019-10-22 17:24:44 UTC  

But there were too many requirements from the US military on the aircraft

2019-10-22 17:24:49 UTC  

Developing our own planes would be stupidly expensive

2019-10-22 17:24:51 UTC  

It's *too* multirole.

2019-10-22 17:24:53 UTC  

The only countries that are buying F-35 are those that want to earn US good boy points.

2019-10-22 17:24:55 UTC  

Sadly true @Dubdogelmo