Well, I still feel we must not forgot there are two important things about being human. Intelligence and creativity

boys learn maths and logical functions much quicker at an early age

girls choose smaller groups because it is easier to determine relative difference

and relative position

i mean currently as the boys age they fall behind their female counterparts accademically now

boys look to establish hierachy

I feel this is more important than overanalyzing differences in gender, but then that's us arguing over feelings and perception

but it used to be theyd start off ahead and stay head

ahead*

which is best done with groups of 5 or 6

on an average curve

im talking age tho

average curve of WHAT though?

boys will not corral into groups into later ages

that is the thing; IQ isn't EQ and neither is AQ

groups with hierarchies i should say

boys focus on AQ

girls on EQ

If its done by hierarchy its not moral but social

which indicates a deeper understanding of social intelligence

both have similar IQ curves

girls start off with a better social adv

I don't think that men and women always inherently fill each others faults or that it lines up quite so nicely. After all, human beings need many types of social relations.

People they trust in more than one group

boys start off with a much stronger emphasis on logic and individuality

girls are constantly connected to the social adv as well

boys disconnect

Disconnect your life suppory

With my 9mm

do it pussy

the formula is 'nature AND nurture'; there is no OR operator

im a rick and morty fan

I know the universe is meaningless

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

Changing topic, but I think human beings have somewhat lost their ability to have all the necessary solid bonds that they may have had in the past

well yeah

we're socially retarded

thanks internet

Dunlaps Number applied to Social Media

I think that there were perhaps more people that people would trust as much as a partner in the past.

kids of today are socially stunded