Message from @Osbornia
Discord ID: 637352511086264341
and a pecking order is also established even in toddlers
hmm
boys are alot more rough and tumble vying for power up until 5 or 6
women leverage social influence to compansate for physcial ability
girls form groups at around 3
they quite literally learn social skills twice as fast
no it isn't
whereas the boys develop much quicker in other areas
because boys learn by doing
girls do not
these are well documented things amongst young children
they learn by interpretation FAR easier
the initial stages, girls learn social function much quicker
Well, I still feel we must not forgot there are two important things about being human. Intelligence and creativity
boys learn maths and logical functions much quicker at an early age
girls choose smaller groups because it is easier to determine relative difference
and relative position
i mean currently as the boys age they fall behind their female counterparts accademically now
boys look to establish hierachy
I feel this is more important than overanalyzing differences in gender, but then that's us arguing over feelings and perception
ahead*
which is best done with groups of 5 or 6
on an average curve
im talking age tho
average curve of WHAT though?
boys will not corral into groups into later ages
that is the thing; IQ isn't EQ and neither is AQ
groups with hierarchies i should say
boys focus on AQ
girls on EQ
If its done by hierarchy its not moral but social
which indicates a deeper understanding of social intelligence
both have similar IQ curves
girls start off with a better social adv
I don't think that men and women always inherently fill each others faults or that it lines up quite so nicely. After all, human beings need many types of social relations.
People they trust in more than one group
boys start off with a much stronger emphasis on logic and individuality
girls are constantly connected to the social adv as well
boys disconnect
Disconnect your life suppory