young children

no, it's more than that

the girls organise groups much earlier than boys

it's also for protection

and a pecking order is also established even in toddlers

hmm

boys are alot more rough and tumble vying for power up until 5 or 6

women leverage social influence to compansate for physcial ability

girls form groups at around 3

they quite literally learn social skills twice as fast

no it isn't

whereas the boys develop much quicker in other areas

because boys learn by doing

girls do not

these are well documented things amongst young children

they learn by interpretation FAR easier

the initial stages, girls learn social function much quicker

Well, I still feel we must not forgot there are two important things about being human. Intelligence and creativity

boys learn maths and logical functions much quicker at an early age

girls choose smaller groups because it is easier to determine relative difference

and relative position

i mean currently as the boys age they fall behind their female counterparts accademically now

boys look to establish hierachy

I feel this is more important than overanalyzing differences in gender, but then that's us arguing over feelings and perception

but it used to be theyd start off ahead and stay head

ahead*

which is best done with groups of 5 or 6

on an average curve

im talking age tho

average curve of WHAT though?

boys will not corral into groups into later ages

that is the thing; IQ isn't EQ and neither is AQ

groups with hierarchies i should say

boys focus on AQ

girls on EQ

If its done by hierarchy its not moral but social

which indicates a deeper understanding of social intelligence

both have similar IQ curves

girls start off with a better social adv

I don't think that men and women always inherently fill each others faults or that it lines up quite so nicely. After all, human beings need many types of social relations.

People they trust in more than one group