Message from @Osbornia
Discord ID: 637353020795125760
im talking age tho
average curve of WHAT though?
boys will not corral into groups into later ages
that is the thing; IQ isn't EQ and neither is AQ
groups with hierarchies i should say
boys focus on AQ
girls on EQ
If its done by hierarchy its not moral but social
which indicates a deeper understanding of social intelligence
both have similar IQ curves
girls start off with a better social adv
I don't think that men and women always inherently fill each others faults or that it lines up quite so nicely. After all, human beings need many types of social relations.
People they trust in more than one group
boys start off with a much stronger emphasis on logic and individuality
girls are constantly connected to the social adv as well
boys disconnect
Disconnect your life suppory
With my 9mm
do it pussy
the formula is 'nature AND nurture'; there is no OR operator
I know the universe is meaningless
<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
Changing topic, but I think human beings have somewhat lost their ability to have all the necessary solid bonds that they may have had in the past
well yeah
we're socially retarded
thanks internet
Dunlaps Number applied to Social Media
I think that there were perhaps more people that people would trust as much as a partner in the past.
kids of today are socially stunded
Or close or you know whatever
stunted*
But we are just sort of blocked into thinking
A partner would resolve all that
Not so
like sure they might be smarter and more "connected"
If Dunlaps Number represents the upper bandwidth limit for juggling social relationships, then what used to be divide amoung a select few is now divided by millions making the relationships extremely shallow
but put them in a room of 30 peers and tell them they must talk and make friends no tech allowed
they struggle
its been shown we have less trusted friends on average than people in.. the 80s I think it was.
Truly trusted relations