Message from @ᛋᛉKLOᚢ
Discord ID: 637352951752425472
but it used to be theyd start off ahead and stay head
ahead*
which is best done with groups of 5 or 6
on an average curve
im talking age tho
average curve of WHAT though?
boys will not corral into groups into later ages
that is the thing; IQ isn't EQ and neither is AQ
groups with hierarchies i should say
boys focus on AQ
girls on EQ
If its done by hierarchy its not moral but social
which indicates a deeper understanding of social intelligence
both have similar IQ curves
girls start off with a better social adv
I don't think that men and women always inherently fill each others faults or that it lines up quite so nicely. After all, human beings need many types of social relations.
People they trust in more than one group
boys start off with a much stronger emphasis on logic and individuality
girls are constantly connected to the social adv as well
boys disconnect
With my 9mm
do it pussy
the formula is 'nature AND nurture'; there is no OR operator
im a rick and morty fan
I know the universe is meaningless
<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
Changing topic, but I think human beings have somewhat lost their ability to have all the necessary solid bonds that they may have had in the past
well yeah
we're socially retarded
thanks internet
Dunlaps Number applied to Social Media
I think that there were perhaps more people that people would trust as much as a partner in the past.
kids of today are socially stunded
Or close or you know whatever
stunted*
But we are just sort of blocked into thinking
A partner would resolve all that
Not so
like sure they might be smarter and more "connected"
If Dunlaps Number represents the upper bandwidth limit for juggling social relationships, then what used to be divide amoung a select few is now divided by millions making the relationships extremely shallow