Message from @TempleOfIron
Discord ID: 623864756876476428
LMAO
greens/efa is not a single party
epp are you talking about another group?
european peoples party group?
imagine my shock when britbongs dont know how EUparliament works
get educated britbongs
2k cant seem to name a single party thats bigger than the brexit party in the EU
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
how do you vote on who's responsible for the results of a negotiation? https://twitter.com/MartinDaubney/status/1174212290553548806?s=20
'vote' more like acknowlege, the EU negotiated a deal with the UK government, which then failed to get past her own parliament, if the UK leaves without a deal, then from the EU perspective she is fully responsible for that.
*it*
Using *she* is sexist
After all, they stopped calling ships she <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Load of bollocks
I do hope the govmt win the supreme court cases - the salt will be satisfying
Same
I imagine they will win.
they will win
No that
It was a political matter, which means the courts have no duty meddling
I'm less confident
But am entirely sure Scotland's courts need scrapping
Especially given their conduct in Dank's appeal
Listening to the afternoon session
The traitor side is basically just trying to compliment the court to victory
No actual statements of fact or anything yet
Compared with the morning session, which was devoid of emotion and was just solid facts
Now he is arguing that Scots law is somehow a higher standard than English high court
So therefore they should accept their decision
This is literally just poetry and emotion
He is bringing up fucking macbeth
He isn't making any points other than asking the court to rule with the Scots inner circle
Because of the fact they are the supreme Court and diversity
Is it that o'neil chap?
Yeah
He just tried to prove precedent
And lady hale disagreed and he had no real response to that
Tried to prove prorogative power was justicable with a single case