a million barrels a day goes through there
What about south Korea?
They depose a leader that they disagree with and replace them with a leader who is inevitably worse
the whole west would fall apart if ghadaffi went through with his threat
https://twitter.com/KeithMFarmer/status/1174082141572993024?s=20
that also went ... better than if there was no intervention.
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Let the country itself deal with it
What? How was Pinochet worse than fucking commies?
are you high?
Like in Venezuala for instance if the people want change they should make the change happen themselves rather then allowing the US to intervene
And how is south korea worse than if it was all communist?
https://twitter.com/RenRengel/status/1174313190232076289?s=20
It might have been better off if we let the North take over
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
You are evading my questions. How is Pinochet worse?
The North was actually doing quite well until it lost that war
Where are you finding all these retards from, 2k? Is there some sort of mailing list of them?
It's the principle of it, We should have let the people of Chile depose Pinochet and if they couldn't then so be it, We should not intervene
replace "unicorn" with reciprocal trade deal.... and pony with.... er.. well yeah pony that still works
FYI Chile has highest GDP per capita in SA
@Eccles they are all my alt accounts on twatter
That would explain it
just self plugging here
The US didn't help depose him, you illiterate imbecile, they helped him get into power.
and that was the correct thing to do
The US just shouldn't intervene just let the countries work everything out themselves
You may not care about geopolitics, but geopolitocs cares about your country, and therefore you.
>"I know little of history of US interventions, and am generally uninformed on the matter, but trust me, the US just shouldn't do it" Yeah, sure.
I'll admit i don't know much about the Pinochet case but i will still stand by the Principle that the US shouldn't intervene
I’m generally against US intervention to depose people, because they generally end up with dictators. However, if the USA was to depose an authoritarian and unpopular leader, I’d be all for it TBH
bring back saddam tbh
@2K tbh yeah
Well, since you seem to be claiming that Korea would be doing better if it was all communist, it's hard to take your principles seriously.
He was at least stable
Ghadaffi too
A lot of the issues with regime change in the modern day have been that we get rid of a dictator who was keeping islamists out of power
*WOULD; Freudian slip there
@leavethisbotnet I am saying that it could have been because North Korea was actually doing reasonably well before it lost the war
Ermm
Not so sure about that
