Sure

Why not

There are 5 MPs in manchester and 2.7m live there

They can take Scotlands MP's

650 MPs, 70m people

yes

https://twitter.com/SandyxB/status/1177290031536529409

Very roughly 1 MP per 100,000 people

Yes, Lizard, nearly half the country have gone full-retard

https://tenor.com/view/mad-as-hell-howard-beale-angry-gif-14809797

You know

I stand corrected

Youre right

Cities are the people underrepresented

you probably sit corrected to be fair

I don't think that's true either

well manchester has 5MPs for 2.7m

For example

Yorkshire and humber has the same pop ish as SCOATLAAND

with the similar number of MPs

Manchester has 27MPs

Devolution however

Was a mistake

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Parliamentary_constituencies_and_Members_of_Parliament_in_Greater_Manchester

Greater manchester

that includes places like stockport etc

I was talking about manchester

You know, im on a losing streak today

Constituencies aren't as simple as that

5 in manchester

but 500k

Even if you pick out of that list the constituencies you think are Manchest, then they're the same rough population each as the wider area

The stat I saw said "Manchester 2.7m"

but it meant greater manchester

Manchester is the actual city

with places including ashton under lyne, Oldham etc

making up the boroughs

So greater manchester is Manchester (The metropolitan borough)

and it's boroughs

However they are usually conflated which lead to my confusion

However the record is now straight