Message from @Joshu
Discord ID: 627661816217993217
🙂
so in blasphemy cases, it is sufficient to not prove the claims are accurate. ok.
It is essentially criminalising someone for telling the best truith we know
but not backing it up
" for telling the best truth we know", ah but is it?
She got criminalised for lack of citation
That sounds like "The innocent have nothing to fear" when the KGB come knocking.
on a true statement
Yet she couldn't prove it to be a true statement
It does Slen
Like I said
And in this context, it's harmful.
They assumed guilt
she couldnt prove it wasnt blasphemy? right.
who really cares what the muslims believe anyways, we should just deport them to france and say fuck you
that means its ok to prosecute someone for blasphemy then
You really do need to look at the context
It makes all the world difference.
Weez, they assumed guilt
She shouldn't have had to prove it to be true, because its the prosecution's job to prove she is guilty, which would mean they would have to prove she was lying.
maybe its the correct way in the EU
No and you would know that if you read the link.
all the more reason to get out
I read it and that was the conclusion i came to
EU, the land of cucks
She could not prove her innoncence
Read it again.
Lol if you think the UK won't be cucks if we leave the EU
better than being in that shit
We've a lot of work to do to change that, I'll be honest. But its a start.
The fundamentals of the justice system are better
Why so the retards can make stronger pro feminist laws?
saying that, it depends whos at the helm
for one
Can't unfuck the UK while under the heel of the EUSSR.
we need more <:bojo:627262664279851044>
The UK is fucked either way
Agreed
It is. But it can be unfucked.
Move then, if you think there is no hope