And you won't have these issues

🙂

so in blasphemy cases, it is sufficient to not prove the claims are accurate. ok.

It is essentially criminalising someone for telling the best truith we know

but not backing it up

" for telling the best truth we know", ah but is it?

She got criminalised for lack of citation

That sounds like "The innocent have nothing to fear" when the KGB come knocking.

on a true statement

Yet she couldn't prove it to be a true statement

It does Slen

Like I said

And in this context, it's harmful.

They assumed guilt

she couldnt prove it wasnt blasphemy? right.

who really cares what the muslims believe anyways, we should just deport them to france and say fuck you

that means its ok to prosecute someone for blasphemy then

You really do need to look at the context

It makes all the world difference.

Weez, they assumed guilt

She shouldn't have had to prove it to be true, because its the prosecution's job to prove she is guilty, which would mean they would have to prove she was lying.

That is the backwards way of doing things

maybe its the correct way in the EU

No and you would know that if you read the link.

all the more reason to get out

I read it and that was the conclusion i came to

EU, the land of cucks

She could not prove her innoncence

Read it again.

Lol if you think the UK won't be cucks if we leave the EU

better than being in that shit

We've a lot of work to do to change that, I'll be honest. But its a start.

The fundamentals of the justice system are better

Why so the retards can make stronger pro feminist laws?

saying that, it depends whos at the helm

for one

Can't unfuck the UK while under the heel of the EUSSR.

we need more <:bojo:627262664279851044>

The UK is fucked either way

Agreed

It is. But it can be unfucked.