No it doesn’t hence terrorism is not targeting the state who are responsible for the actions in the Middle East

All terrorists do is make people more annoyed at middle eastern people and now are less aggrieved if said government continues to bomb them

'We the People' RIP

I'm not saying that the terrorists are right

I'm saying the idea that 'the ppl' are sovereign is dumm^^

Think in a way you are considering you said the action is proper

wat? (edited)

Since they are sovereign you think said terrorist are therefore just in their actions to target them to in turn effect the state

Logically speaking

I'm saying that, were they indeed sovereign, they would, yes.

Very obviously

You bomb em

they get mad

they bomb you

Not if u bomb them well enuf

Das a separate issue

I’m sorry for interrupting continue

No because billy bob isn’t telling the government to bomb Muhammad cause he is getting water

You drive us ever further from God @Canadalake

Ofc Billy bob isn't

Hahaha this guy gets it ❤

but the constitution of the US claims he does

the ideological foundation of his polity claims he does

I don't think it;s true

I'm just saying republics *claim* this is how this shit works.

Republics claim they vote people in to represent them on matters of state. Leadership in turn acts on their behalf. Which you can argue sure. But overall doesn’t give ya right to terrorism. Since anyone outside a 5 year old knows that’s not cut and dry as the idea of a republic is.

I mean if we accept that gov *represents* the ppl

then it represents the ppl

if the ppl are indeed sovereign

then they surely are responsible for the military actions of their army

Their sovereign enough to elect people after that point it’s out of their hands.

at least the adults

you are correct, but this is not what the ideological doctrine claims

Sure but again doesn’t give ya the legitimacy to be a terrorist

republics don't claim they elect their sovereigns, they claim the ppl *are* sovreign

Again: I'm not saying the terrorists are doing good. I'm saying the reason why it is possible to say they are not doing good, is the fact republics are built on a lie^^

I don’t think it is a lie. Because republics innately operate as any government would for utility and self preservation on a macro scale. But the constitution protects our rights and aligns us as sovereign.

Ok, then terrorists ARE fine

No there not lol. Because then we can still just keep bombing them if they want to make it a zero sum game.

I mean you can