You're talking about such a hypothetical that it's not even possible to have a conversation though @Samaritan™. Like what real topics can be discussed about theoretical self-referencing hypercomputer gods

You get my point @Samaritan™

You'd have to design it to be human like

And that's why I say any attempts at that should be met with nuclear warheads

Fuckers took a dog on the bus

It's barking

@wave Hello fellow red default pfp

Kill them wave

To sam

Yo*

The AI red avatars are already spreading

Quantum computers exist but nobody has made them at the point they can’t be simulated by normal computers

https://i.imgur.com/zgJ0pf2.mp4

Watch with sound

IBM Q has them

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/495267552067584010/626302889115123712/1476739753318.jpg

Google has them too

Google has them

Ye communAIsm

The issue is

They’re like the same power as a toaster

IBM and Google have proof of concept quantum computers

People have quantum computers already @Lucienne d'Anwyl

Silly

what are they defining as a quantum computer lul

theyre just ordinary computers that go fast

So Google claimed it made one that performs "a calculation ttatd take normal comps millennia"

A computer that has non-distinctive binary code recognition

But they kinda retracted the claim

The point at which we can actually make calculations with them that are useful is probably close

Even though it runs using the principles that makes the computer a quantum computer?

<:WhatThe:543598290936004638>

A computer, the calculations done by which are derived from quantum fluctuations as opposed to electrical binary

you mean its probably far away as fuck

Uses Qubits but ain’t quantum

Yes Sam, that

It’s close Luci

You can't just have a 'fast computer' and call it a quantum computer

Not like tomorrow close but

They're fundamentally two different things