Message from @svarozhyc

Discord ID: 626408560091463690


2019-09-25 13:22:15 UTC  

Hypothetical being?

2019-09-25 13:22:19 UTC  

Salient and compelling emotional response

2019-09-25 13:22:21 UTC  

@ubermensch that's a more meaningful position than "AIs will turn us into the matrix" , which is about the level of thought the general public are on

2019-09-25 13:22:43 UTC  

AI will do whatever we tell them, sadly

2019-09-25 13:22:55 UTC  

And when we tell them what we want they’ll deliver, sadly

2019-09-25 13:23:03 UTC  

They want to talk about the kind of AI have while we where talking about the kind of AI that would be so smart it'd have very high level philosophical thinking of its own

2019-09-25 13:23:13 UTC  

Imagine putting someone with a 300 IQ to work on one problem

2019-09-25 13:23:25 UTC  

It’d be like that

2019-09-25 13:23:28 UTC  

google is just retarded

2019-09-25 13:23:31 UTC  

Its retarded to say there is something wrong with my side of that conversation its just not the same conversation that you want to have

2019-09-25 13:23:33 UTC  

Salutations gentlemen

2019-09-25 13:23:33 UTC  

no one has a quantum computer

2019-09-25 13:23:42 UTC  

AI would have higher iq then 300

2019-09-25 13:23:44 UTC  

and most likely no one will by the end of the century

2019-09-25 13:23:47 UTC  

He substrate is important

2019-09-25 13:23:50 UTC  

AI will take what we give them and will run with it to its zenith. So it’s entirely based on who makes it and how the handle the system. Doesn’t make the system in of itself any less dangerous

2019-09-25 13:23:50 UTC  

get dabbed on google cucks

2019-09-25 13:23:52 UTC  

Brains work in a specific way

2019-09-25 13:23:53 UTC  

You're talking about such a hypothetical that it's not even possible to have a conversation though @Samaritan™. Like what real topics can be discussed about theoretical self-referencing hypercomputer gods

2019-09-25 13:23:53 UTC  

You get my point @Samaritan™

2019-09-25 13:23:58 UTC  

You'd have to design it to be human like

2019-09-25 13:24:17 UTC  

And that's why I say any attempts at that should be met with nuclear warheads

2019-09-25 13:24:22 UTC  

Fuckers took a dog on the bus

2019-09-25 13:24:26 UTC  

It's barking

2019-09-25 13:24:32 UTC  

@wave Hello fellow red default pfp

2019-09-25 13:24:47 UTC  

Kill them wave

2019-09-25 13:24:49 UTC  

To sam

2019-09-25 13:24:54 UTC  

Yo*

2019-09-25 13:24:55 UTC  

The AI red avatars are already spreading

2019-09-25 13:24:55 UTC  

Quantum computers exist but nobody has made them at the point they can’t be simulated by normal computers

2019-09-25 13:25:02 UTC  

Watch with sound

2019-09-25 13:25:03 UTC  

IBM Q has them

2019-09-25 13:25:11 UTC  

Google has them too

2019-09-25 13:25:14 UTC  

Google has them

2019-09-25 13:25:15 UTC  

Ye communAIsm

2019-09-25 13:25:16 UTC  

The issue is

2019-09-25 13:25:25 UTC  

They’re like the same power as a toaster

2019-09-25 13:25:25 UTC  

IBM and Google have proof of concept quantum computers

2019-09-25 13:25:31 UTC  

People have quantum computers already @Lucienne d'Anwyl