Yes Sam, that

It’s close Luci

You can't just have a 'fast computer' and call it a quantum computer

Not like tomorrow close but

They're fundamentally two different things

unless google is lying

like they always do

Next 10-20 years close

lol

Which runs on different principles

Of course they are

IBM isn’t lying

@Samaritan™ okay those numbers are literally just Google doing some math in excel

But in which direction

@lunemarie like how fusion is only 20 years away?

xD

Maybe

Because you can use IBMs

We said fusion was 20 years away 20 years go

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Q_System_One

@Samaritan™ their quantum computer isn't even functional enough to do that

The article isn't exactly from a trustworthy source

"IBM Q System One is the world's first-ever circuit-based commercial quantum computer, introduced by IBM in January 2019"

We keep coming close to a breakthrough on fusion, and fucking up and finding a new wall

But it works as a good hypothetical

"designed by UK-based Map Project Office and Universal Design Studio and manufactured by Goppion"

**RULE BRITTANIA**

Unless you have another example to point to

**DEVELOPING THE NEXT GENERATION OF COMPUTING**

God Save the Queen!

God bless.

Go make a new empire you redcoat tyrants

As for fusion energy that’s about efficiency more than you know feasibility too

Monarchy? Nasty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_quantum_computing @Lucienne d'Anwyl

Too bad it's 9ftx9ftx9ft and requires atmosphere control

Fusion reactors exist and work

Fusion isn't happening for a fucking while

>2018

>2019

fusion reactors dont work in a useful capacity