It's less and less unique to black communities now, however.

I see similar issues unfolding throughout plenty of predominantly white communities, too, including in those multi-racial.

Such as a disproportionate crime rate to their overall population percentage. That, along with more time with police, but getting killed by police less other ethnic groups.

Indeed.

....in other words, statistically a black individual may see the same officer 5 times before getting shot, whereas 1 white person may have one interaction and get shot.

idk man I think every community has "unique" issues.
The Anglo-sphere with their white guilt and desire to destroy themselves is amazing to me
@Jeremy and @Brokkr

I think that's crazy unique. Never seen anything like it

Yeah. I have no shame in my ancestry.

....and any debts I had were paid in blood.

In reference to what is promoted, culturally, there are parallels, especially in urban environments where you see street culture adopted by all racial groups.

It's no longer a matter of "black culture" now.

So, even working under the presumption that anyone in my family tree owned slaves in the US (they didn't), my family fought and died for the Union. Paid in full. I have nothing to answer for.

Right, @nimble_newt, which is quite illogical in my view.

Then again, I'm a firm believer that I'm only responsible for my own actions....not the actions of others.

Ding-ding-ding-ding.

I do not benefit, socially, from the efforts of my parents. Why should I be punished for their alleged sins?

Newt, have you since returned to the UK?

Such is the perceptive split between the collectivist and individualist.

Sure. The difference between a Constitutional Republic and a Representative Democracy is individual accountability vs collective rights.

Correct.

And while you'll see an embrace of one over their other at one point in time, it is just as easily disposed of when motive of self-interest is served.

Don't mistake advocates of collective perspectives as anything but self-interested.

On another Discord server someone asked me if I support gay marriage politically. They did not expect my answer of: "It should not be political. The government needs to step back from marriage and enact a legal terminology which speaks to the contract of two or more individuals and custody."

IE, I neither support nor am against gays getting married. It is not my concern. The government not having a say in the matter is.

They'd strip away your property, then seek the State's protection once they have it.

I bring this up because....at one point, blacks could not marry whites.

....now it's same-sex and poly couples.

Correct.

That's a rather classically liberal perspective, one we share.

Yeah. Weird how I don't fit into a box, huh?

Not at all; you're not an ideologue.

So, I went looking for Sargon's patreon. It's gone.

Then I learned he was banned.

....and I was not surprised.

They used the old 'Hate Speech is real, and you violated it because we say so.' strawman.

I'll admit there's a perception bias going on, but we all know what we're getting when we turn to Sargon, and that's exactly why we seek his content, to be informed on that which people dismiss because their priorities are deemed sacrosanct.

Did they even elaborate on what his violation was, within the ToS?

What content, to be precise?

Not really, from what I saw. It was, presumably, his anti-feminist content.

Considering feminism is, in fact, cancer......

Probably that.