https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/google-home-smart-speaker-audio-recordings-privacy-voice-spy-a9000616.html?utm_source=reddit.com

"There are scholars that would argue that the Confederacy was a proto fascist state. It sure as shut wasn't "rebellion against tyranny," it was tyranny through and through. You just claimed to be anti-Nazi while throwing up the American equivalent."

Well, that's the dumbest thing I've read all day.

If anything, the North was fascistly trying to enforce its ideology

Tommy was aquitted on that court case compromising charges

In America, that'd be a double jeopardy issue

In Britain, it's coo, just try him again

Now they are going after "tommy caused psychological trauma to child molesters"

@Uksio what?

Well we wouldn't want that

That

child molesters have feelings too

poor dears

I thought he got convicted

Nope

Wasn't that the news yesterday?

They failed to convict him on contempt of court and now have new charges

He huwt the feeewings of chiwd mowestews

I thought he was being sentenced. What's he being sentenced for it not convicted?

Maybe they convicted them on that psychological trauma thing, IDK

Which would be funny as hekk

He was convicted on the contempt last i saw

He was found guilty of contempt of court

A child molester is higher on the progressive stack in UK than a reporter

I dont see any news against that

@Uksio you're wrong friend

Weird

What if someone is a pedo **and** a journalist? <:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>

Pedornalist, in short.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytt25vljxpg ah new one just started

@retxirT every journalist

https://is2.4chan.org/pol/1562858606374.webm

Honestly though like

Tommy, we get it

but you a dumbass

Wait.. so he mighta (psychologically) hurt a group of people that have, individually, performed what's generally considered a monstrous act?

The contempt thing is understandable.. but.. look.. we're talking about a series of individuals that have given up their rights by violating *children*.

I'm just trying to get my head around that one.

(Things about the entire "inalienable rights" concept is that, whilst they are inherent they can be relinquished by violating other's rights.)

Of course, my lense is singularly US.. so..

@King Canuck let's say he is. His anger and actions were righteous. This is unjust

@Laucivol how is it understandable?