Message from @Swedishmafia101
Discord ID: 599181120327909386
But then who would Stacy complain to when her boss dares to put his hands on her shoulders
Huffpost
I don't trust voters, and I don't trust HR departments.
What I trust is an unbiased, objective performance metric. Even if it's just a knowledge test. At the very least you're selecting for people who are willing to study intensively in an effort to get the job they want.
Someone that's willing to spend 10+ hours cramming for a firefighter's exam is probably more qualified than some jackass from the local community college. If you're worried about physical abilities, then have them take a physical test too and add that to their overall score.
Accurately reading polls is like shooting a shotgun.
Stupid?
You get a spread around different places but a pretty consistent spread at a target
Also, accuracy goes to shit when you're far away.
Except for the 2016 election
True
Where they were shooting blindfolded
the polls were pretty accurate for the 2016 election
>99% hillary
they were just interpreted in a retarded manner
The problem with the 2016 election is they started shaming everyone for supporting Trump, so a ton of them either didn't answer the pollsters or they lied and said they were a Hillary voter.
Yep true
the polls leading up to the election had hillary leading the popular vote by about 3%
Same case in Sweden
and she won the popular vote by about 2%
very close
it is just that the results of the polls were interpreted incorrectly
people didn't take into account the dynamics involved with the electoral college
Its amazingly close considering the population of the cities
Not necessarily. People in the government have explicitly barred any attempts at validating the citizenship of registered voters, and the "voter fraud" research they've done has never involved actually going through the fucking registry and validating the citizenship of people who vote.
Polls are retarded
I read somewhere that almost 40% of people in California voted Trump
Polls showed trump would lose polls showed remain would win polls showed labour would win in australia all wrong polls are a lie
Just because Hillary Clinton "wins" the popular vote, that doesn't mean eligible voters supported her over Trump. Quite frankly, I'm not willing to "believe" any of our elections until we validate the voter registry and purge anyone who can't verify citizenship.
well most people in california probably voted for trump, clinton got votes from hispanics, blacks, and thots, not people
That's because the polls were retardedly conducted, intentionally or not
the popular vote isn't necessarily indicative of popular will since the presence of the electoral college affects how people vote and how politicians campaign
@Death in June except about 1/3 of all Mexican-Americans voted for Trump
I think California and New York had a fuckload of illegals and noncitizens voting when they shouldn't have been, and I'm going to hold that belief until they go through their registry, name by name, and then arrest anyone who shows up that isn't a citizen.
Since the democrats removed voter id from their states on purpose I wouldn't be surprised if they'd lose popular vote without illegals
well and that is also without getting into what constitutes popular will of course
They've never once done a name-by-name check of the voter registry in ANY state, and they really need to.
Does California have voter ID laws?
No, and Cali gave driver IDs to illegals, which they can use to register to vote.
They are a sanctuary city thats probably a big fuck no
So don't believe shit in the election numbers coming out of California.
The election numbers CANNOT be trusted. Not until they validate the registry.
Sanctuary cities are literally criminal