Message from @Samaritan
Discord ID: 599192239633072139
It was inevitable we'd have lower birthrates compared to the generation that have 8-9 siblings
yeee belle is fucked
yeah
Yeah, but "lower birth rates" was supposed to mean 2.1 kids. Replacement rate. Steady population.
everything relies on china dying before they can get world hegemone
The next generation would be exponentially poorer
there is no reason why we should have more than 0.25 children per woman
I think we should have nuked China in the Korean war
everything will go back to norm during this century
@Tato - The Belle Delphine situation is fucking hilarious, TBH. Have you seen H3H3's video on it?
so why go for short term solutions that will only fuck us over in the short term
Slow decrease please
ye i have ;dddd
Ideally we should he at 4-5B people
when we could bet on china's downfall (which is basically our only hope) and go for the long term
i hope everyone who bought it will sue her
even if it's hard short term
That's not even the wests fault
ala brexit
short term fuck over
long term benifit
Yeah they'll chill once they grow economically
China and India are sending people overseas by the boatload, so I wouldn't count on a downfall anytime soon.
Richer nations have lower birthrstes
@Arthur Grayborn Don't let them in
300 mil americans compared to what 1 billion ching chongs how many hundred thousands is that?
Yet again its communisms fault
jack that happens in individualistic countries
not in collectivist
china wont fall. they have a massive technological advantage in terms of green energy and so on
u cant rely on that
China is survive because they are willing to kill as many people as it has to to survive
^
collective above all
Great leap forward 2 electric boogaloo
they must be divided
into smaller states
We can't fight china really
Or we can but no one would like it