Message from @Tato
Discord ID: 599192109915963402
Decrease in population would rape the economy but we'd bounce back eventually
@Samaritan well only the people who rely on welfare will die
the economy is fucked
Problem is China will become the world Hegemone in that time spam
we need long term solutions
A decreasing population only makes sense if you're willing to hang old people out to dry, and I'm not sure we're ready to do that.
Why wouldn't it
to fix it
It was inevitable we'd have lower birthrates compared to the generation that have 8-9 siblings
yeee belle is fucked
yeah
Yeah, but "lower birth rates" was supposed to mean 2.1 kids. Replacement rate. Steady population.
everything relies on china dying before they can get world hegemone
The next generation would be exponentially poorer
there is no reason why we should have more than 0.25 children per woman
I think we should have nuked China in the Korean war
everything will go back to norm during this century
@Tato - The Belle Delphine situation is fucking hilarious, TBH. Have you seen H3H3's video on it?
so why go for short term solutions that will only fuck us over in the short term
Slow decrease please
Ideally we should he at 4-5B people
when we could bet on china's downfall (which is basically our only hope) and go for the long term
i hope everyone who bought it will sue her
even if it's hard short term
That's not even the wests fault
ala brexit
short term fuck over
Its China and India with the large populations
long term benifit
Yeah they'll chill once they grow economically
China and India are sending people overseas by the boatload, so I wouldn't count on a downfall anytime soon.
Richer nations have lower birthrstes
@Arthur Grayborn Don't let them in
300 mil americans compared to what 1 billion ching chongs how many hundred thousands is that?
Yet again its communisms fault
jack that happens in individualistic countries
not in collectivist
china wont fall. they have a massive technological advantage in terms of green energy and so on
u cant rely on that