Message from @Reprehensibletrash

Discord ID: 600540440600772659


2019-07-16 04:10:29 UTC  

Jesus, you don't get it.

Exactly like capitalism, but the state owns everything.

That's the ONLY fucking difference.

2019-07-16 04:10:32 UTC  

@randomNPCno3 boundaries and corners aren't the same thing

2019-07-16 04:10:36 UTC  

@ManAnimal socialism is one party control of all revenue streams

2019-07-16 04:10:42 UTC  

not exactly like capitalism

2019-07-16 04:11:05 UTC  

That way the state can readily reallocate resources and account for externalities in business decisions, because in every decision the state eats all the externalities whether positive or negative.

2019-07-16 04:11:06 UTC  

cause it wouldn't be driven by capital interests but by social interests

2019-07-16 04:11:14 UTC  

it would be fundamentally different

2019-07-16 04:11:28 UTC  

people wouldn't have the same motivation to work for a livng

2019-07-16 04:11:34 UTC  

Not currently but I have somewhat read up on that, right now its Carlo Michelstaedter, he partially inspired Evola @ΟΊ14α›Ÿ

2019-07-16 04:11:40 UTC  

@Reprehensibletrash I said corners for a reason. Paper math works on paper but not always in the real world , same for socialism. Works only paper ONLY

2019-07-16 04:11:44 UTC  

or take on more risk

2019-07-16 04:11:57 UTC  

@Arthur Grayborn interesting that you don't have a single example of such a system, yet claim to know the inner workings

2019-07-16 04:11:57 UTC  

@ManAnimal - Why do people work for a living now?

Why should anyone at Walmart give a damn if they don't own the corporation?

Simple: They get fucking paid.

2019-07-16 04:12:20 UTC  

so they can earn capital and use that capital to p urchase what the want and need

2019-07-16 04:12:35 UTC  

they work and get what they want

2019-07-16 04:12:53 UTC  

no work? no house no food

2019-07-16 04:12:58 UTC  

Implying that the same would not be true under socialism.

2019-07-16 04:13:06 UTC  

@randomNPCno3 imagine if AOC wrote in the first three pages of the green new deal, that her ideas are completely asinine and non-functional. Would you still consider it to work in theory...?

2019-07-16 04:13:11 UTC  

No work, no house or food.

Work harder, get nicer house and better food.

2019-07-16 04:13:13 UTC  

but it isn't a discrete

2019-07-16 04:13:18 UTC  

Because that's literally how Engels and Marx wrote it

2019-07-16 04:13:38 UTC  

They admit the complete lack of even theoretical function

2019-07-16 04:13:39 UTC  

8 hrs as a doctor isn't 8 hrs as a mcdonalds employee

2019-07-16 04:13:49 UTC  

Yeah, exactly.

2019-07-16 04:13:57 UTC  

@Reprehensibletrash no, her plansl look like they were written by a child. She shouldn't be in government

2019-07-16 04:14:03 UTC  

Under socialism doctors could still have mini-mansions while McDonalds employees live in small apartments.

2019-07-16 04:14:10 UTC  

so... again, if they are the same then why work?

2019-07-16 04:14:40 UTC  

and if they aren't the same salary who determines who makes what?

2019-07-16 04:14:54 UTC  

who gets to determein value

2019-07-16 04:15:02 UTC  

I agree with that opinion, but that doesn't really answer the question. If the writer themselves admits they're defying all reality, how can you take their theory as even practical on paper?

2019-07-16 04:15:17 UTC  

@ManAnimal - That's such an incredible straw man, it's not even funny. Socialism does not mean economic equality. It does not mean that McDonalds burger flippers and highly trained doctors are going to have the same exact housing and food budget.

The problem in socialism is that government bureaucrats would fuck it all up. They always do. Always.

2019-07-16 04:15:31 UTC  

it wasnt a man of any kind

2019-07-16 04:15:31 UTC  

@Reprehensibletrash - Who the fuck says I'm even considering Marx or Engels?

2019-07-16 04:15:32 UTC  

Socialism fails because they try to create objective facts out of arbitrary values

2019-07-16 04:15:32 UTC  

@Vir ah hadn't actually heard of him. I haven't read as much Traditionalist literature as I have Fascist since it incorporates a lot of the good ideas traditionalism has into it most of the time anyway.

2019-07-16 04:15:35 UTC  

they were QUESTIONS

2019-07-16 04:15:53 UTC  

@Arthur Grayborn notice how I wasn't tagging you

2019-07-16 04:16:01 UTC  

That's because I wasn't talking to you

2019-07-16 04:16:08 UTC  

burrecrats doing what?

2019-07-16 04:16:16 UTC  

πŸ‘πŸ»

2019-07-16 04:16:29 UTC  

read Evola if you havent its wacky and borderline crazy a lot of the time