because you a discriminating on the ground of the characteristic you've selected

clue is in the name

MUHHHHHHHHHHHH TOMMMMMMMMYYYYYYYY

WHAT THE FUCK IS WITH SPEEDRUNNERS BEING TRANS???

who is the "you" in this case

the government, typically, or an institution

Give me that 110% QT

😍

110% <:mutt:462285123421732874>

yeah that's par for the course for social liberalism

he is a youtuber iirc

it's not social liberalism

https://i.redd.it/ak2xpcsaw7b31.png

yeah discrimination based on a characteristic selected by the state is a facet of social liberalism

like with a progressive income tax

it's not liberal

@King Canuck heresy

bruh

so would you say social liberalism is illiberal

it is if you want it to be free to call itself liberal

wherever the fuck berkeley is

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZAq72EYp6w

we need to put em all in there

i would argue positive descrimination isn't social liberalism

@Eccles Literally noone cares.

but the thing you have said about positive discrimination that makes it illiberal is a facet of social liberalism

We need to remove kebab

if we're gonna say that positive discrimination is good

no, you just claimed it was

i'm claiming it isn't

i know, im just stating a point

if we say its good

<:thinkcide:462282415549841409>

remove trannies or remove kebab first?

that means its alright to say asians are geniuses

but

too many choices

whether it is good or not is actually irrelevent

we can't say niggers are dumb