I was just trying to be helpful by pointing to a rather obvious error in your thesis. To a normal adult human this should result in a "my bad" or correction. Happens all the time in regular life.

Nah, the thesis is correct, just because there are a few outliers. Graph population size and landmass

Instead you seem dead set on arguing as to how 2 plus 2 might somehow equal 487 because the only other possibility is that you made a mistake.

Ok mate 🤣

Outliers? Did you look at the chart? China has close to the landmass of the US.

India has half the landmass of *Australia* Outliers 😂

A lot of that isnt hospitable you brainlet

Same for canada and russia

A bunch of China is fucking desert iirc

I suppose by your logic, Australia's an outlier, since it's bigger than India (despite the former only having like 25M people)

You recall wrong, dirty commie scum

Australia is incredibly arid

https://www.reference.com/geography/deserts-china-353c276b1bae83ed

the fuckin pakis!

*Indians

Does anyone think war with Iran will actually happen

hope not

i hope it does

y

I know that nearly all the superpowers won’t use nuclear bombs because they know the effects of dropping one of those motherfuckers because they have had national experience with that shit, even if it’s not bombs. It’s radiation. I believe that bioterrorism will be used tho, though I doubt jihadists will put scientists to work. Dunno

Well they have no problem with bomb making, so I doubt they’d have a problem with the creation of other weapons.

@Quicksilver053

Unlikely. This is not the first time they have fucked about in Hormuz. Look up "Operation Praying Mantis". The US can severely impair Iran without fighting a war.

Hasn't happened yet, probably won't happen ever

Israel maybe if iran gets a nuke. they would preemptive strike. have before

Tim did a funny vid on Bernie

the hypocrisy of the socialist types is amazing

*15$ for all*

*except my staff*

A hypocritical socialist millionaire? Surprised Pickachu Face

they never learn

15 for thee, but not for me

🇺🇸FOUR🇺🇸MORE🇺🇸YEARS🇺🇸

<:trumpepe:588019356215279642>

Imagine what a good place the dems would be in if they just ignored Trump, focused on issues like jobs and workers rights, tried to build up candidates who didn't make anti american gaffes every 10 seconds. My god, how easily would they walk into the white house?

Part of being a politician is being incompetent. To expect more of them is akin to expecting a chicken to soar like an eagle.

Ben Franklin wanted the nations bird to be a Turkey

Petition to have the national bird changed to a Turkey

✅ or❎ only pls

<:thinking_clown:590855640268668928> thatd be racist though

it would only make sense for the dems to do that if we assumed they weren't accountable to a higher authority

I think I'll probably join For Britain over UKIP if I'm honest.
For Britain is overall less cucked while UKIP can't even decide what it wants to do.
It's more democratic in my opinion, while never being part of one myself I don't see how not letting specific people join because they used to be in some party at some point is meant to represent the voice of the people.
The name is pretty obsolete come Brexit as well and I think they'll just look to get rid of Sargon once they elect some cucked leader.