Message from @Hexidecimark
Discord ID: 603606206103420952
Ah
Around the time we kicked natives in the balls for being dicks
i mean nationalization and the welfare state are predicated on the presence of a centralized state which they are opposed to, and the means of gaining power in regards to anarchists and fascists have historically been different
i mean if anything the way in which anarchists and liberals have gained power are more similar to eachother
both originated via revolutionary means
well look at how it was accomplished and then consolidated
fascists gained power by working within the systems
in italy and germany
Anarchists are just Liberals who take themselves seriously tbh
<:thunk:462282216467333140>
Anarchists are ppl on pipe dreams
the organization of labor could be a similarity
Hence why you always see em as ancaps or ancoms
They have an idea of society *must* be
>AnPacs
First and foremost
First they found a target class, then they applied force to convince people to support them, then they consolidated and eliminated points through which opposition could be brought into existence
And then think their "form of anarchy" will achieve that
i mean how is this any different from how liberalism operated
When anarchy really just has one "form"
Ye, anarchists are cringe and gay. But That's how Liberalism looks like when you takes it's tenants seriously.
Heyyyy
I like Locke
Locke is ridiculous
No u
*dabs*
if most ppl vote for something that means the minority that didn;t is now magically not *forced* to follow the results. Literal nonsense
No
liberals had their target classes in the form of the nobility, royalty, and clergy and they applied force to bring their proposed systems into being
What
HE just assumes democracy goo
Locke didnt invent democracy
ofc not
he just defends it in this particular way
Locke advocated for minority protection
and in the case of eliminating opposition the original french republic was even more vociferous about this than fascist italy was
By adding the idea of rights and social contracts
Rights make no sense
it was scarcely harsher on dissent than liberal polities at the time despite it being in a rougher position internally and externally even
Well