Message from @Jym
Discord ID: 604715516182921269
good damn racist white people wanting people like them to immigrate to their country
So racist to want some semblance of homogeneity, it's the current year after all
^^
I can't believe you don't love Jews unconditionally
Haven't you heard of the original sin?
Israel is our greatest ally
@ETBrooD
The European model where you have socialism so people can migrate to your country, go on the dole, and move to an ethnic ghetto without being made to interact with your culture. In this country we want migrants to live and work and deal with life within our culture without subsidies.
dont you remember when they dropped bombs of peace on the USS Liberty?
It's certainly a model that most European countries employ
Not mine though fortunately, we integrate them fuckers or they can piss off
Sure. I think much of what went wrong was that Europe saw a legitimate problem, and saw how the US had solved that problem. They then tried to solve the problem without realizing that we have a very different system.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9zH1dWeKE0
race is king
sorry cucks
motherfuckers dismissed the Covington kid's lawsuit
So basically invest in India right now
what else is new
Invest in India
Mainly in toilets
that would be cultural appropriation
Look at that distribution though between male and female mortality rates. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Eh maybe. The Indian demographic is consumption stable that does not guarantee growth. And since the US is the only developed economy with a stable demographic likely the cost of capital is going to go up meaning long term you're going to struggle for rate of return.
India superpower 2020
So I'm currently reading Starship Troopers and a lot of the government I take a liking towards.
However and more so did Sargon address this in his video on the politics of Starship Troopers the I would describe as the excessive use of Capital and Corporal punishment?
For example it is said that for the crime of drink driving on will be publicly flogged. Or perhaps if one violates military law in striking a superior officer he might face the penalty of being hung.
I've just skimmed through Sargon's video and I'm not sure where he addresses this?
Heinlein puts a very strong focus on discipline through violent action, be it civilian or those in service.
I'm curious on how Sargon addressed this issue
im not sure public flogging would be entirely unfair for drink drivers
I think he mostly glossed over the slight excessiveness of the Corporal punishment aspect of that government system
the video was more about the structure, politics and society of the law abiding and peacefull citizens
I do agree that a more in depth look at the criminal justice system and civil justice system in the book is required
inb4 jewish conspiracy & lefty zionist loons
** *ooof* **
Link
Orthodox Jewish woman named cybersecurity chief for US spy agency
Anne ‘Chani’ Neuberger grew up in mostly Hasidic Brooklyn neighborhood of Borough Park; parents were among hostages rescued during Israeli raid on Entebbe
> https://www.timesofisrael.com/orthodox-jewish-woman-named-cybersecurity-chief-for-us-spy-agency/
I heard the Presidents own daughter is *gasp* an orthodox jew......
Wait...
Some more info tho.
|
Neuberger led the NSA's election security efforts for the 2018 midterms, having served as the NSA's first chief risk officer. Anne (Chani) Neuberger grew up in Boro Park and went to Bais Yaakov of Boro Park. She lives in Baltimore.
@AVRO Architect I'm just curious where Liberalism falls on such practices.
Which of course was the major premise of his video.
Explaining that it was a ultra liberal utopia rather than any fascistic.
Now of course I entirely agree that it isn't a fascist utopia but I'm still unsure of it being really a liberal utopia.
Besides the excessive use of corporal punishment and capital punishment to which I'm torn on its overall ethical nature I have my own opinions personally on the issue of government and rights.
Personally I'm of the opinion that the taxpayer should still be levied the right of his own sovereignty to where if capital is paid towards in taxation and to which laws rule over him.
Now I'll entirely give to the point that only those willing to risk life and limp should be given sovereignty over the right to demand others give willingness to do the same.
What business is it of the civilian to say how and why a man should die for them and their benefit.
Also I think my main moral objection to corporal/capital punishment is that it's state approved sadism.
Or I should say state sanctioned sadism which would be illiteration.
Although correcting myself has only given me a better chance of exampling that.
I'm less torn over the corporal punishment. States that have it have much lower recidivism rates. I do have an ethical qualm about *enforced* corporal punishment. I could see it as a diversionary program. Say one lash per month. Like if sentenced to a year in jail you could opt for 12 lashes instead. There is a societal gain there. You can (maybe after some sick leave) go back to work and pay your bills after 12 lashes. Most people do not have 12 months rent in the bank. So the current penal system releases what are essentially homeless unemployed people with job experience in criminal enterprise.
"to which laws rule over him."
"You can't murder that guy!"
"But I paid my taxes"
"It's still illegal"
"Nah, not for me"