Message from @TheCinemaShow
Discord ID: 607257655668637716
even if it makes them miserable, also
Anything that is not a gay space communist utopia is evil
was trying to find the song he did
but ended up finding this
here's an example of the segment
This is probably one of the examples a more sincere argument
seem to be a lot more sincere arguments than I remember
I think the more ironic joke arguments were in the song he did by the same name
His universal healthcare argument is pretty shitty, because he doesn't account for how much of the expense of the US system is a consequence bearing the cost of much of the world's medical R&D, as well, as the high cost of our medical training compared to many other countries due to the regulatory capture of licensing. Nor does he acknowledge how the difference between the US and Canadian expenses my be a product of the dramatically different demographics. He uses, of all examples for revising the system, Maine, which is very white, and therefore a very bad example of what would likely happen. He's also naively optimistic of the capacity for governments and cartels to surrender funding they've already secured just because they don't need it anymore.
Interview of Aldus Huxley
@ETBrooD
Yeah that would be a typo it was like past 1 in the morning when we had that chat and whenever you start using technical terms half of them get red underlines. Really cool that you're interested in the subject. I just really think people should study the subject directly rather than through YouTubers and random PubMed articles. If you're not into books I mentioned Sopalsky's intro the whole course is available free online from Stanford. Or for psych course that includes biological factors Bloom's is available from Yale.
@Miniature Menace
Fred Reed wrote a satire in the same vein. The overall thesis was that social welfare programs were a plot by the KKK to cripple black communities.
I'm a pleb on these subjects, but I find them fascinating yeah
thx for the recommendation
What are people's thoughts on this? The comments on it are just salty MGTOW ppl from what I can tell
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LoqjY8V9JIo
Doesn't seem that controversial to me.
Why do people judge a video by the comment and not by the content of the video itself? It is just guilt by association.
I watched that video and I did not agree with it
Guy sounds like a 2007 neocon
Who fucking cares if some guy watches porn, go fuck yourself McCain
mad cuz you like watching porn
Nothing will change. This hookup culture and the 80/20 rule that comes with it is a women's utopia. Male celibacy rates will continue to skyrocket as they have over the last 10 years. Women en masse aren't gonna vote to take away the absurd advantages they have in the family courts. Nobody on either side of the aisle advocates for men, so the laws will stay the same. Marriage rates will continue to plummet as more men realise how little reward and high risk now comes with it. MGTOW life philosophy will continue to spread amongst men due to a refusal to change from women and society's position. We can all guess where society goes from there. The End.
jkjkj guys I just copied this from a random comment
I got a wall of text incoming regarding this https://youtu.be/n7jlTYSeHWA
I need this copy pasta
Just wanted to share my friends thoughts since he is a German
And it also adds to the video IMO
no balls
lel
On the topic of Soygon's latest video: "The Validity of Nazi Comparisons - feat. Three Arrows"
First a minor point:
I largely agree, perhaps with the exception that, from a strictly propaganda perspective, Soygon seems to make too big of a deal of English, or indeed Anglo, uniqueness. I understand that more nuance is not strictly necessary to put the point across, but it *sounds* really bad when he claims that Anglos are just immune to Nazism. Again: I understand that he is not necessarily saying that they are in fact immune to to any and all wrongdoing, but the way he frames the issue does *sound* like he might, which just opens him to accusations of blinding pride and/or chauvinism. It's just unfortunate to make a good argument, and present it in a way that is open for crude attack.
.
And now for a more "important" point:
When Soygon discusses the "We are Deutch" video, he omits, perhaps to save time, a point that I remember perturbing me the most when I saw the video years ago. Namely that the new ideal German is depicted as gleefully aggressive towards not only the passé, old German "bigot", but also explicitly towards foreigners who disagree with the new German "ordering" of the world. The people who end up being charged by the angry mob of... Liberated (?), degenerate new Germans, hold up placards with the faces of Dutch and Hungarian politicians... The new, Ubermensch is just as validated in his righteous, joyful crusade against other polities and their peoples, as the SS were. Just as long as they do not comply with the German prime directive of the moment. The Germans haven't learned almost anything from what their polity did in the early XXth century. All they learned is that the previous thing they were insanely zealous about was bad. They haven't learned that being insanely zealous about things leads to an inherent sense of moral superiority born of excellence in the chosen temporary madness; and thus to the justification of subjugation of others as, we the Germans have *clearly* mastered the current zealotry far better then anyone else, which must make us not only inclined to lead the lesser people(s), but bestows on us the moral duty to lead them. And if they disagree, well, we know best anyway, so why would that matter? It's awfully convenient a way to structure your social moral framework, if you're an expansionist empire who's main tactic of expansion is to be direct military force directed at a comparable opponent.
.
N.B. It's similarly convenient to the Anglo pretense of not having any shared responsibility for the actions of one's polity. If an Englishman buys inexpensive produce from a merchant in York, because the Crown supports and defends British trading companies abroad, it is no reason for the simple Englishman to feel bad because of the fact said trading companies' entire purpose of existence is to structure the supply chain so as it is in Britain that prices are low, and abroad that the wages are low. Out of sight, out of mind it is for the English individualist...
the entire use of 'the English and 'the German' in the video turns me off tbh, it just sounds wrong
i disagree with the point about only germans being evil enough to run auschwitz. all humans are capable of evil, this is not a uniquely german thing.