Message from @Weez

Discord ID: 609183091084230666


2019-08-09 00:32:47 UTC  

is it anything like The Purge?

2019-08-09 00:32:50 UTC  

and have next to no faith in our politicians or the system

2019-08-09 00:33:02 UTC  

It's like the purge if the purge was a picnic

2019-08-09 00:33:24 UTC  

Idea is the right to vote for ways to decide our leaders.

2019-08-09 00:33:34 UTC  

What if you could vote for say, a competition

2019-08-09 00:33:57 UTC  

would the political leaders be having an orgy?

2019-08-09 00:33:59 UTC  

And whatever contests you think would whittle down to the best person for the job

2019-08-09 00:34:21 UTC  

Yeah, but wouldn't such competitions also have corruption involved (not the the level of say....a regular election, I suppose....but it would still be present)?

2019-08-09 00:34:39 UTC  

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck The only feasible thing, would be to nationalise them

2019-08-09 00:34:47 UTC  

Possibly, but it being a competition might get people more interested

2019-08-09 00:35:00 UTC  

@Weez yeah, seems like a good idea

2019-08-09 00:35:03 UTC  

Which means the referees might have to look behind their back for bad calls

2019-08-09 00:35:08 UTC  

Just like Soccer

2019-08-09 00:35:26 UTC  

Have the govt distribute assets towards other lesser companies (such as Gab), mayhaps?

2019-08-09 00:35:36 UTC  

Are we trying to turn politics even more into reality TV than it already is?

2019-08-09 00:35:40 UTC  

Probably not, allow them to continue to operate

2019-08-09 00:35:45 UTC  

You can be bored all you want. As soon as you stop putting thought into your electoral decisions and start donkey(non-vote not a ref of the us democrats) voting your nation will be in the pits sooner rather than later.

2019-08-09 00:35:49 UTC  

Not ALL of their assets @Weez

2019-08-09 00:35:55 UTC  

just enough so it's a level playing field

2019-08-09 00:35:58 UTC  

But a government sets the TOS for the sites.

2019-08-09 00:36:06 UTC  

Or, some body does.

2019-08-09 00:36:15 UTC  

More so to get the community involved and away from the TV instead of just politicians

2019-08-09 00:36:24 UTC  

the actual sites themselves, are presumably the ones who set their own TOS

2019-08-09 00:36:34 UTC  

Then just allow the tech giants to keep working as they do

2019-08-09 00:36:42 UTC  

Level em out

2019-08-09 00:36:45 UTC  

Except the government enforces them to have reasonable TOS

2019-08-09 00:36:48 UTC  

Issue is

2019-08-09 00:36:53 UTC  

You don't want to kill the innovation

2019-08-09 00:36:59 UTC  

And the political power that they provide

2019-08-09 00:37:03 UTC  

Say you could become mayor by winning one of these competitions

2019-08-09 00:37:14 UTC  

Limiting how Twatter bans people would kill innovation?

2019-08-09 00:37:18 UTC  

how does THAT work?

2019-08-09 00:37:19 UTC  

It might encourage kids to learn more

2019-08-09 00:37:32 UTC  

No no, I mean like distributing their assets kinda thing

2019-08-09 00:37:36 UTC  

We don't want to kill them

2019-08-09 00:37:45 UTC  

We want them to keep working and keep innovating

2019-08-09 00:37:49 UTC  

Well obviously it'd kill innovation for getting around the bans

2019-08-09 00:37:50 UTC  

Yeah, I definitively don't.

2019-08-09 00:37:53 UTC  

We just.. Want them to have a policy change

2019-08-09 00:37:56 UTC  

Twatter isn't hiding a terrorist or anything

2019-08-09 00:37:58 UTC  

(AFAIK)