Message from @SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck
Discord ID: 610901825540980766
the river doesn't coincide with the border completely.
Republicans do tend to treat survivors of shooting incidents like lepers
the parkland survivors that were shown in the media were assholes though
"republicans have blood on their hands" etc
Like lepers my ass
Williamson’s role in the race is something like that of a progressive counterpart to Jordan Peterson, reminding her audience that Medicare for All or free college won’t cure the deep-seated ills of despair and aimlessness affecting the nation.
https://news.yahoo.com/marianne-williamson-offers-priestly-wisdom-103038883.html
Williamson would be a legit hilariously great VP.
I expect her to be using crystal vibrations to determine matters of state.
If trump wasn't on the ballot I might actually vote for her
I wouldn't even if it was her and McCain.
Ew gross. Who in the hell would vote for McCain unless they're blindly following party lines
No
Williamson is extremely naiive
And wants to enact reparations
Isnt makes me sad
Isnt
ISN'T
wut
*isn't, makes me said
or alternatively
*isn't....makes me sad
Don't be grammar nazi's
You know what he was trying to say
My ancestry is part-German, so this is my god-given right, goddammit
Williamson would get overwhelmed with the politicing that happens. She might be able to adjust but I have a feeling she wouldn't know how to deal with the depth of deceipt she would encounter.
She's a horrible person who pushes white guilt and probably thinks the poem on the Statue of Liberty is actual immigration policy. All I see is her saying we should be lovey dovey to each other and everything will be fine. That's what a mother tells her small children, not what a leader tells the people. She doesn't understand the root causes of why people are upset, especially people who supported Trump, and either can't or won't look at them. Instead she tries to paper over the cracks with syrupy words. That article was written by a fan girl who doesn't understand any of these things, either.
wow, thats amazing
I think there's a balancing act for that
In the short-term, you obv use your own judgement, and dont pay excessive attention to temporary uproars
In the long-term, you understand the will of the people and act accordingly
De Facto vs De Jure
De Facto all MP's are elected to excersise their own judgement, with the understanding that people can and will vote them out if they fuck up enough.
De Jure, because of this they are meant to represent the best interest of their constituents in Parliment
We wouldn't be having problems though if there hadn't been a giant mis-match between the de facto practicalities of getting elected and running wild, and ignoring your de jure responsibility's
>"you got a license for that chair?"