Message from @burgermeistermeisterburger
Discord ID: 609490738358779924
Beastiality with an animal that can very easily kill you and has not been restrained physically or chemically to prevent that is "fair enough", since the animal's lack of killing you for it could be interpreted as consent.
So go ahead and fuck an adult tiger or whatever.
But like, a normal dog? wtf is wrong with you.
Leviticus 20:15-16 If a man has sex with an animal, he must be put to death, and the animal must be killed. If a woman presents herself to a male animal to have intercourse with it, she and the animal must both be put to death. You must kill both, for they are guilty of a capital offense.
1 Corinthians 15:38-39 But God gives it a body as he has determined, and to each kind of seed he gives its own body. Not all flesh is the same: People have one kind of flesh, animals have another, birds another and fish another.
>tmw you choose a dog over a man
I feel now's a good time to bring up the fact that a lot of women have been fucked by their dogs.
>tmw you choose a goat over a woman
And if you ever see a pap with the note K9+ it means she's one who has.
why are the animals given death penalties gg
because they got too uppity
you do not fuck the slave class
probably under similar reasoning as why most animals are sleep'd if they eat human for any reason.
Jude 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire
you dont want to keep a dog that wants to fuck you
unless you're into that
and if you aren't
Yes but see they put the one who was into that to death
you remove the corrupted dog
<:deus_vult:466354779841495040>
nothing.
Ok then
<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> Changed roles for Jarko#8374, +Silence, -Xenos
What did jarko do?
he jark'ed
Actually tho
Cowlitz enlighten me
@killsode-slugcat ok that creepy guy, bashing a metal pole thing... naa... please don't.
BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG
<:pepsiMiddleFinger:366973793106919424> pee pee poo
Imagine reading a post, but over the course of it the quality seems to deteriorate and it gets wose an wose, where the swenetence stwucture and gwammer rewerts to a pwoint of uttew non swence, an u jus dont wanna wead it anymwore (oΒ΄Οο½o) awd twa wol owdewl iws jus awfwul (Β΄ο½₯Οο½₯`);. bwt tw powost iwswnwt obwer nyet, it gwos own an own an own an own. uwu wanyaa stwop weadwing bwut uwu cwant stop wewding, uwu stwartd thwis awnd ur gwoing two fwinibsh it nowo mwattew wat! uwu hab mwoxie kwiddowo, bwut uwu wibl gwib ub sowon. i cwan wite wike dis fwor owors, swo dwont cwalengbe mii..
A spectwe is haunting Euwope β the spectwe of communyism. Aww the powews of owd Euwope have entewed into a howy awwiance to exowcise this spectwe: Pope and Tsaw, Mettewnyich and Guizot, Fwench Wadicaws and Gewman powice-spies. Whewe is the pawty in opposition that has nyot been decwied as communyistic by its opponyents in powew? Whewe is the opposition that has nyot huwwed back the bwanding wepwoach of communyism, against the mowe advanced opposition pawties, as weww as against its weactionyawy advewsawies? Two things wesuwt fwom this fact: I. Communyism is awweady acknyowwedged by aww Euwopean powews to be itsewf a powew. II. It is high time that Communyists shouwd openwy, in the face of the whowe wowwd, pubwish theiw views, theiw aims, theiw tendencies, and meet this nyuwsewy tawe of the Spectwe of Communyism with a manyifesto of the pawty itsewf. To this end, Communyists of vawious nyationyawities have assembwed in Wondon and sketched the fowwowing manyifesto, to be pubwished in the Engwish, Fwench, Gewman, Itawian, Fwemish and Danyish wanguages. I. Bouwgeois and Pwowetawians* The histowy of aww hithewto existing societyβ is the histowy of cwass stwuggwes. Fweeman and swave, patwician and pwebeian, wowd and sewf, guiwd-mastewβ‘ and jouwnyeyman, in a wowd, oppwessow and oppwessed, stood in constant opposition to onye anyothew, cawwied on an unyintewwupted, nyow
hidden, nyow open fight, a fight that each time ended, eithew in a wevowutionyawy weconstitution of society at wawge, ow in the common wuin of the contending cwasses. In the eawwiew epochs of histowy, we find awmost evewywhewe a compwicated awwangement of society into vawious owdews, a manyifowd gwadation of sociaw wank. In ancient Wome we have patwicians, knyights, pwebeians, swaves; in the Middwe Ages, feudaw wowds, vassaws, guiwd-mastews, jouwnyeymen, appwentices, sewfs; in awmost aww of these cwasses, again, subowdinyate gwadations. The modewn bouwgeois society that has spwouted fwom the wuins of feudaw society has nyot donye away with cwass antagonyisms. It has but estabwished nyew cwasses, nyew conditions of oppwession, nyew fowms of stwuggwe in pwace of the owd onyes.
implying we take advise form paypigs
