You should give a coherent statement with something to refer to in history or current events.

Your talking like a computer

@ETBrooD And what ideology shall it that be?

You talk like a narcissist. You talk like everything's a big secret, you don't want to reveal nothing. Just pretend there's something.

Because in actuality you know nothing

I'm not @Wizard_of_The_West . I'm just trying to refer to a serious concern posted by Mr. Rosenberg.

I do know SOMEthings, not everything but it enough.

You dance around the core of your argument, you have nothing

It is what i know I'm trying to reveal in concession with Mr. Rosenberg's work @ETBrooD .

And what is my argument ,then?

That's my point, you have no argument, it lacks a core

Cause I have not made it yet, if you follow the discussion.

Yes, that's my point

Like just say it

We want to know what you have to say but you're not arriving at the destination

I want to say there are 2 distinc states human cultures can fall into-progressive or conservative.

Those two are mutually exclusive.

Tell us something new

Since they are mutually exclusive any and every society at any point of its history must choose to be either progressive, or conservative.

The new point @ETBrooD is that if you choose to be progressive you MUST choose to prefer change over certainty, but if you choose to be conservative you MUST prefer survivability over change.

yawn

I asked you to tell us something new, but you're not going to apparently.

The two are mutually exclusive and what people can't get, never get is precisely that CHOICE!

You can't both be progressive and give equal freedom in decision making for all and be conservative and advocate saving your renowned political structure and habits. Can you get it?

You either give liberty to a bunch of fools hoping for the better, but preparing for the worst, or, you deny access to newcomers to your political institutions and decision making processes. You MUST CHOOSE either option, can't have both.

So as a real world example, modern Western countries just can not BOTH give everyone free access to their social institutions and save the aforementioned institutions.

Then tell me why America is probably the most divided western country between progressivism and conservatism right now

If you want to save the institutions, you must limit the access to them, if you want to give equal rights to anyone, you can not save the very institutions that gave them this access.

Which will it be, then?

Cause of

EVOLUTION @ETBrooD !

Do wish to elaborate it for you?

Called it

https://gyazo.com/82415f5c1a5bf50468329151ade219d5

But I should extrapolate ideas from complexity sciences like biology, maths, geology and even computer science to be able to explain it why to you.

I'm afraid Humanities themselves won't cut it!

So, do you have the patience for such a diversion?

"I never said genetics"
...
"Yes, genetics"

The plot thickens

Evolution isn't based solely on genetics.

Eugenics here we come.