Don't let me run the numbers.

The bottom line is that the dems will simply not allow yang through. It’s going to take some real clown world magic to put yang anywhere near trump in a debate

And even then..,

Good, Yang is too inexperienced and a beta anyway

You want your president to be an egotistical jerkoff?

Better than a child

He doesn't even have hair on his balls yet

I've checked, you can see it when you watch the debates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Permanent_Fund

He may not even have balls

That’s what you get with a candidate for gen Z

That is as I would predict, Weez

As I imagined it would be as well.

Confirmation bias at its best

'substance abuse', people getting hammered<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

We should trial it for a year, full scale in the UK and see what happens @Eccles

Yeah lmao @Αγωνιζῆς

Good for businesses 😉

Depends on how it is implemented, Weez

Alaska, being a high latitude place, has a natural higher rate of alcohol abuse

That I didn't know.

I don't think you're going to see it work unless it replaces all welfare, tax credits, state pensions, and tax-free allowances

Hmm true.

Which likely won't happen

Yeah lets implement UBI in the UK that's a good plan

I want to see that county go to shit anyway

So the people stop cucking around

500 pounds per month for 60 million people would cost £360,000,000,000

Nice

360 Billion

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_welfare_spending_40.html

A lot more than we currently spend tbh

Bear in mind you'd also be scrapping the tax-free tax allowances, Weez

True

https://uk.wikibudgets.org/w/united-kingdom-budget-2016

Damn look at this

Never mind it's cancer to use

Either way, 360bn + scrapping the tax-free allowance, plus the saving of costs, you're close to the 290bn current expenditure

A smaller scale test is required then kek

To see how it impacts economic growth