Of course it has scientific basis, what kind of argument is that?

We can't argue for it any more than we can argue against it

It doesn't, no

UBI is UNIVERSAL

And?

It has not been tested universally

So?

Do you understand what science is?

Yes, dear

Then you must know that it's not been tested scientifically

You don't test tax policy "scientifically"

>basic income has

>Not a universal one

We can take the knowledge learnt from the basic income and see what a universal one will *LIKELY* do

No, we cannot

Aye, Weez, and you run the numbers

I'll run the numbers so I get more money than everyone else.

Don't let me run the numbers.

The bottom line is that the dems will simply not allow yang through. It’s going to take some real clown world magic to put yang anywhere near trump in a debate

And even then..,

Good, Yang is too inexperienced and a beta anyway

You want your president to be an egotistical jerkoff?

Better than a child

He doesn't even have hair on his balls yet

I've checked, you can see it when you watch the debates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Permanent_Fund

He may not even have balls

That’s what you get with a candidate for gen Z

That is as I would predict, Weez

As I imagined it would be as well.

Confirmation bias at its best

'substance abuse', people getting hammered<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

We should trial it for a year, full scale in the UK and see what happens @Eccles

Yeah lmao @Αγωνιζῆς

Good for businesses 😉

Depends on how it is implemented, Weez

Alaska, being a high latitude place, has a natural higher rate of alcohol abuse

That I didn't know.

I don't think you're going to see it work unless it replaces all welfare, tax credits, state pensions, and tax-free allowances

Hmm true.