Message from @Flavius Stilicho
Discord ID: 621041299134480421
<a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280> <a:crabdance:586596248648417280>
"After shouting ‘shame on you’ to those in the prorogation procession, Labour MPs refused to leave the Commons chamber and started singing the 19th century socialist song. The Marxist anthem, largely abandoned by the Labour Party in the 1990s, has been given a resurgence under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn."
oof
Labour are now unofficially socialist, therefore, purged
BIG OOF
WEW
NOT EVEN HIDING IT
That explains the fraternization with and highly suspect, disproportionate amount of foreign investments flowing in from the PRC.
Not even hiding it.
They welcomed the PRC's acquisition of a firm that both produces and manages communications infrastructure for Britain's military and government.
Labour stamp of approval!
oh no how will Boris ever come back from this
Through unofficial state-cartels, the PRC is carving out vital chunks of the British economy.
>Bolton is gone
https://twitter.com/AmbJohnBolton/status/1171455806069305346
The legacy media is claiming Trump fired him, despite Bolton having resigned due to policy disputes.
Clearly Trump wanted to talk to him the next day so he could get the sacking in first 🙄
Yeah walrus man
They enjoy adding their own contextual twist to give the appearance of impulsivity on Trump's part.
That undermines confidence in the Executive Office.
I mean for a politician 'quitting over policy disputes' is basically being fired...
That sends the wrong message to allies and adversaries as well.
They upset because Bolton wants another war
Bolton just wants to play the chess-game, rather than capitulate to adversaries making long-term geostrategic advances.
>Bolton just wants to play the chess-game
https://tenor.com/view/john-bolton-evil-laugh-gif-11491135
A weakness in resolve isn't a message we should continue conveying.
There are better solutions than bombing whatever country China or Russia may be manipulating
Did someone say.....**"BOMB IRAN"**?
That gives our adversaries a license to continue their march onward.
I rather directly confront the adversaries
Nothing a little **bombing Iran** won't fix
Even Trump has spoken of bombing Iran, while in fact being the one to make the decision to strike Syria. I'm not in favor of merely bombing Iran, I favor using low-yield nukes to wipe them out.
We should've wiped out China, Iran and all of our other adversaries when we first got the bomb before the Soviets stole the requisite documents.
Y'know guys, **bombing Iran** is a good thing, guys.....
I'd honestly go for China first
they're more of a threat TBH
It is, because every single adversary of ours won't respond.