thre are guns with mags on the side tho

which dont have field of view problems

smh shoot at the mag

**who the fuck would put 30 rifle rounds on the side**

They have twisting issues

that would unbalance the gun

@SideTracker pretty sure thems some fake subs, jimbo

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck nigga i need you

When a round is sticking to the side it wants to turn your gun whenever you are limp-wristing it

drop to PM

@Spooky Melon FG42?

the ones that **did** have magazines on the side, were intended to be held by the magazine, and were pistol caliber

I cannot breathe that was comedy gold side tracker

@Uksio fg42 is a weak man's gun

absolutely terrible

https://twitter.com/Ruptly/status/1168204584516558849?s=20

i dont think they can give that lol

britain did give hong kong back

no wonder they only made 7000

Fg42 is actually a real man’s gun

I am not saying it is good, I am saying that FG42 had a 35 round mag in a prototype stage

britain is never going to get hong kong from the clutches of the chinks

there is no hong gong guise

we dont count stupid weapons in the weapons argument

people were using the madsen for decades

nobody fucked with the fg42 except a minute number of nazis

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesio_Oseguera_Cervantes

people have used a lot of shitfor decades

And FG42 is one of the only experimental old world weapons still being manufactured and sold today

🤷

@Edog It is a workable machine, but it solves problems that were never there, thus introducing whole new propblems

It is literally an answer to a question no one had asked

I mean. They made a .30 carbine Thompson machine gun for paratroopers

And we don’t talk about that

@Spooky Melon serialised 20 or 10, yes. Prototype had 35

tthommy guns ar great tbh

They deemed that too much