Hm?

jack

If you aren't a 9/11 truther you deserve to be cattle

hes being a 9/11 truther

the mil-spec is easy to reference

shit on him

Oh dear

the holiday where every truther under each blade of grass comes out to spew their 2 decades old hot takes

but you must consider something

<:angrypepe:497157904743268363>

'truthers' are retarded. I am an engineer

It's not about it melting the steel, it's about it being weakened enough to structurally fail

do you idiots believe the official line do you?>

and thats teh thousands of tons of weight pushing down on the on the structure

ARENT YOU THE ONE DENYING THAT HEAT WEAKENS STEEL

and anyone who knows a thing about finite element analysis will tell you the same

MANIMAL

BOOMER

I don't give a fuck about steel

if some of the beams are comprimised, it's only matter of time until they give way

STRUCTURE STEEL DOESNT NEED TO BE EXPOSED TO FIRE FOR ALL THAT LONG

and thus collapse

The report is bull shit regardless of the quality of steel

Imagine thinking that a plane hitting an airplane was done by bush

they blew it up

It was very convienient for the spooks to enact the patriot act

jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, but it certainly burns hot enough to absolutely destroy the structural integrity of steel

but I somehow highly doubt they did it purposefully

Like no matter the petty steel this or timeline this I don’t think bush would do that

satanic yanks

Imagine think a couple towel heads could 9/11 everyone no problem

Exactly al

it doesnt have to MELT the steel

It cost 2.3 trillion dollars to pull that off you retards

https://navysustainability.dodlive.mil/files/2010/04/MIL-DTL-5624-REV-V.pdf

I’m pretty sure the attacks were legit even if they were convenient

There was much less security in planes than there is now

Read the spec for turbine jet fuel

Yea it wasn’t hard back then

the biggest thing since then that actually works was reinforcing the cockpit doors

You absolute nigger