Message from @juts kill nme
Discord ID: 621110293388328981
see
@Anubis come make fun of mananimal for being a 9/11 truther
If you heat up steel enough, you destroy the structural integrity
its been 9/11 for eight and a half hours you backwards fucks
only a matter of time until it gives
given I used to do survivability tests with jet fuel about steel ships...
Hm?
jack
If you aren't a 9/11 truther you deserve to be cattle
hes being a 9/11 truther
the mil-spec is easy to reference
shit on him
Oh dear
the holiday where every truther under each blade of grass comes out to spew their 2 decades old hot takes
but you must consider something
<:angrypepe:497157904743268363>
'truthers' are retarded. I am an engineer
It's not about it melting the steel, it's about it being weakened enough to structurally fail
and thats teh thousands of tons of weight pushing down on the on the structure
ARENT YOU THE ONE DENYING THAT HEAT WEAKENS STEEL
and anyone who knows a thing about finite element analysis will tell you the same
MANIMAL
BOOMER
I don't give a fuck about steel
if some of the beams are comprimised, it's only matter of time until they give way
STRUCTURE STEEL DOESNT NEED TO BE EXPOSED TO FIRE FOR ALL THAT LONG
and thus collapse
The report is bull shit regardless of the quality of steel
Imagine thinking that a plane hitting an airplane was done by bush
they blew it up
It was very convienient for the spooks to enact the patriot act
jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, but it certainly burns hot enough to absolutely destroy the structural integrity of steel
but I somehow highly doubt they did it purposefully
Like no matter the petty steel this or timeline this I don’t think bush would do that
satanic yanks
Imagine think a couple towel heads could 9/11 everyone no problem
Exactly al
it doesnt have to MELT the steel