fallacy

Because bad ideas and believes still drive your decisions

proper information is an IDEAL

You have a good chance at getting divorced, for example.

most times you don't have that luxury

No it's a libertarian position

and if you start placing all your faith in the information, you are easily fooled and dont' recognize when you are being counter-productive

It's likely- that your wife will make most of the financial decisions.

You always can check your surroundings

And go for further information

Oh dear

checking surrroundings is critical

I am willing to prove myself wrong

looking for more info is as well

TFW 50 000 years ago there was only one guy who successfully propagated his genes to modern day <:GWmythiFeelsBadMan:391321619748093972>

Childhood frens all gotten into big politics

how could it be

but at a certain point, you have to make the call

analysis paralysis is a thing

That's why I have read their pseudoscientific papers

that is good for making a counter-argument

but then those people don't care about accuracy

Man, cad today was dull

Wanted to blow my brains out

if they did, the papers wouldn't be pseudo scientific

@Xaverius Ghenghis Khan surely did his part to propagate his gene

those 3 look like theyre about to shoot up a school <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

If you want to gambling being the outlyer, that's your choice, but considering what can be lost, again- you may as well be a smoker, or risk playing with hard drugs, that's how bad it's gotten between men and women.

Over of my points is a lot of boys follow the movement and have no idea if they had any problem to start

It is odd that people don't call Ghenghis a serial rapist

yeah, that's why i can't stand people that throw around statistics as they serve absolutely no purpose

was it rape?

Like none of your local Romanian town rapists will ever come close to the Ghenghis record

it isnt rape if women is conquered <:powerful:595334910764515338>

Yes, there's such a bad paper because there are broken methodology studies everywhere

those listening won't have the time to process and most stat analysis are interpretation

Why did statisticial drown in a lake?
Lake was 4 feet deep on average

make an argument that stands on it's own merit with as little external evidence required to comprehend the argument's merits

don't assume everyone listening has the same detailed knowledge that you do

Well ya, most stats you can easily just tell yourself "ok, so it's like this, now apply X, where X represents other potential variables that won't affect me in this localized area." for example.